首页> 外文期刊>IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics. Part A, Systems and humans >On the Process of Automation Transition in Multitask Human–Machine Systems
【24h】

On the Process of Automation Transition in Multitask Human–Machine Systems

机译:人机系统多任务自动化过渡过程研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper examined the effects of different forms of automation invocation, the reconfiguration of the task display when automated, and the influence of the specific modality that warned of the manual/automation transition on operator performance. Thirty-two experienced pilots engaged in a multiple-task situation consisting of tracking, monitoring, and fuel management subtasks, representative of typical aviation demands. Automation of the tracking task could be invoked in four different ways: 1) system-initiated automation (SIA); 2) pilot command by negation (PCN); 3) pilot command by initiation (PCI); and 4) pilot-initiated automation (PIA). Pilots were warned of the mode change between manual and automated controls by either a visual, an aural, or a combined visual and aural cue. The display of the subtask while in automation was reduced in size and placed either in a central or peripheral location. Results indicated that SIA had a differential effect on tracking performance as compared to all other forms of automation invocation. The respective location of the automated display had it effects in the fuel management subtask, whereas monitoring capability remained stable across manipulations. A significant three-way interaction between invocation procedure, display location, and warning modality illustrated the selective disadvantage of the visual warning combined with the central location under the PCI procedure on tracking response. Measures of subjective response suggested that visual warning modality was slightly more taxing than either an auditory or a combined auditory and visual warning. Pilots also experienced elevated fatigue when the system initiated the automation. These results confirm that both performance and subjective perception of multitask demand are greater when the system controls the option to automate. A qualitative model is presented, which provides an approach for the integrated assessment of human performance with adaptive systems. -
机译:本文研究了不同形式的自动化调用的影响,自动化时任务显示的重新配置以及警告手动/自动化过渡的特定方式对操作员性能的影响。三十二名经验丰富的飞行员参与了多任务情况,包括跟踪,监视和燃料管理子任务,代表了典型的航空需求。跟踪任务的自动化可以通过四种不同的方式来调用:1)系统启动的自动化(SIA); 2)否定飞行员命令(PCN); 3)通过引航(PCI)引航指令;和4)飞行员启动的自动化(PIA)。通过视觉,听觉或视觉和听觉提示的组合,警告飞行员手动和自动控制之间的模式改变。自动化时,子任务的显示尺寸减小了,并且可以放置在中央或外围位置。结果表明,与所有其他形式的自动化调用相比,SIA对跟踪性能的影响不同。自动显示的相应位置影响了燃油管理子任务,而监控功能在各种操作中均保持稳定。调用过程,显示位置和警告方式之间的显着三向交互说明了视觉警告的选择性缺点,并结合了PCI程序在跟踪响应时的中心位置。主观反应的量度表明,视觉听觉方式比听觉或听觉与视觉警告相结合要费些力气。当系统启动自动化时,飞行员也会感到疲劳加剧。这些结果证实,当系统控制自动选项时,多任务需求的性能和主观感知都将更高。提出了定性模型,该模型提供了一种通过自适应系统对人类绩效进行综合评估的方法。 --

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号