首页> 外文期刊>Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. A >Mechanisms, the interventionist theory, and the ability to use causal relationships
【24h】

Mechanisms, the interventionist theory, and the ability to use causal relationships

机译:机制,干预主义理论和使用因果关系的能力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In the area of social science, in particular, although we have developed methods for reliably discovering the existence of causal relationships, we are not very good at using these to design effective social policy. Cartwright argues that in order to improve our ability to use causal relationships, it is essential to develop a theory of causation that makes explicit the connections between the nature of causation, our best methods for discovering causal relationships, and the uses to which these are put. I argue that Woodward's interventionist theory of causation is uniquely suited to meet Cartwright's challenge. More specifically, interventionist mechanisms can provide the bridge from 'hunting causes' to 'using them', if interventionists (i) tell us more about the nature of these mechanisms, and (ii) endorse the claim that it is these mechanisms-or whatever constitutes them-that make causal claims true. I illustrate how having an understanding of interventionist mechanisms can allow us to put causal knowledge to use via a detailed example from organic chemistry. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:特别是在社会科学领域,尽管我们已经开发出可靠地发现因果关系存在的方法,但是我们并不擅长使用这些方法来设计有效的社会政策。卡特赖特认为,为了提高我们使用因果关系的能力,必须发展因果关系理论,以明确因果关系的性质,发现因果关系的最佳方法以及这些因果关系之间的联系。 。我认为伍德沃德的因果关系干预理论非常适合应对卡特赖特的挑战。更具体地说,如果干预主义者(i)告诉我们更多有关这些机制的性质,并且(ii)认可它是这些机制的说法,则干预者的机制可以提供从“寻找原因”到“利用它们”的桥梁。构成它们-使因果主张成立。我将说明对干预主义机制的理解如何使我们能够通过有机化学的详细示例来运用因果知识。 (C)2018 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号