...
首页> 外文期刊>Social Studies of Science >Complacent and Conflicting Scientific Expertise in British and American Drug Regulation: Clinical Risk Assessment of Triazolam
【24h】

Complacent and Conflicting Scientific Expertise in British and American Drug Regulation: Clinical Risk Assessment of Triazolam

机译:英美药物监管中自满且矛盾的科学专门知识:三唑仑的临床风险评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Technological risk assessments can be of major social and political import- ance when they lead to one governmental regulatory outcome or another, as thousands or even millions of consumers, patients or workers may be affected. Typically such risk assessments are underpinned by a form of 'regulatory science'.~1 Under these circumstances, science and technology studies (S&TS) can make a major contribution to understanding the socio- technical bases for different regulatory outcomes, which can inform better regulatory decision-making in the future.
机译:当技术风险评估导致一项或多项政府监管结果时,可能具有重要的社会和政治意义,因为成千上万甚至数百万的消费者,患者或工人可能受到影响。通常,此类风险评估以“监管科学”的形式为基础。〜1在这种情况下,科学技术研究(S&TS)可为理解不同监管成果的社会技术基础做出重大贡献,从而为更好的监管提供依据未来的决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号