首页> 外文期刊>Social science computer review >Testing the Use of Voice Input in a Smartphone Web Survey
【24h】

Testing the Use of Voice Input in a Smartphone Web Survey

机译:在智能手机网络调查中测试语音输入的使用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We implemented an experiment within a smartphone web survey to explore the feasibility of using voice input (VI) options. Based on device used, participants were randomly assigned to a treatment or control group. Respondents in the iPhone operating system (iOS) treatment group were asked to use the dictation button, in which the voice was translated automatically into text by the device. Respondents with Android devices were asked to use a VI button which recorded the voice and transmitted the audio file. Both control groups were asked to answer open-ended questions using standard text entry. We found that the use of VI still presents a number of challenges for respondents. Voice recording (Android) led to substantially higher nonresponse, whereas dictation (iOS) led to slightly higher nonresponse, relative to text input. However, completion time was significantly reduced using VI. Among those who provided an answer, when dictation was used, we found fewer valid answers and less information provided, whereas for voice recording, longer and more elaborated answers were obtained. Voice recording (Android) led to significantly lower survey evaluations, but not dictation (iOS).
机译:我们在智能手机网络调查中实施了一项实验,以探索使用语音输入(VI)选项的可行性。根据使用的设备,将参与者随机分配到治疗组或对照组。 iPhone操作系统(iOS)处理组中的受访者被要求使用听写按钮,该命令中的语音由设备自动翻译成文本。使用Android设备的受访者被要求使用VI按钮记录声音并传输音频文件。两个对照组均被要求使用标准文本输入法回答开放式问题。我们发现,VI的使用仍然给受访者带来了许多挑战。相对于文本输入,语音记录(Android)导致无响应的程度大大提高,而听写(iOS)导致无响应的程度更高。但是,使用VI可以显着减少完成时间。在提供答案的人中,当使用听写时,我们发现较少的有效答案和较少的信息,而对于语音录制,获得的答案更长且更详尽。录音(Android)导致调查评估明显降低,但听写(iOS)却没有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号