...
首页> 外文期刊>Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society >Paradoxes of New Labour Social Policy: Toward Universal Child Care in Europe’s “Most Liberal” Welfare Regime?
【24h】

Paradoxes of New Labour Social Policy: Toward Universal Child Care in Europe’s “Most Liberal” Welfare Regime?

机译:新劳工社会政策的悖论:在欧洲“最自由的”福利制度中实现全民育儿?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article interrogates recent developments in early childhood education and care policy in Britain, taking care to include the experiences in Wales and Scotland alongside those in England. It focuses on the apparently paradoxical aspiration to “universal childcare” in the state usually identified as the most liberal (residualist) in Europe. It finds evidence of greater policy innovation in Wales than in Scotland, despite the weaker formal powers and flimsier child care policy legacy in the former. England displays a second paradox: policy expansion (from a very low base) against an apparently unfavorable background despite a lack of strategic policy coherence. On the basis of this record, the article goes on to a reappraisal of welfare regime theory. It argues that we should expect a degree of incoherence and inconsistency in social policies. As a result, regimes are better understood as abstract concepts than as precise descriptions of particular welfare states, which are better understood as welfare settlements.
机译:本文探讨了英国幼儿教育和护理政策的最新发展,并谨慎地将威尔士和苏格兰的经历与英格兰的经历包括在内。它侧重于通常被确定为欧洲最自由主义(残党主义者)的该州对“全民育儿”的看似矛盾的渴望。它发现,威尔士的政策创新比苏格兰更大,尽管前者的正式权力较弱且儿童保育政策更为脆弱。英格兰表现出第二个悖论:尽管缺乏战略上的政策连贯性,但在显然不利的背景下进行政策扩张(基数很低)。在此记录的基础上,本文继续对福利制度理论进行了重新评估。它认为,我们应该期望社会政策中的一定程度的不连贯和前后矛盾。结果,政权更好地理解为抽象概念,而不是对特定福利国家的精确描述,后者被更好地理解为福利解决。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号