首页> 外文期刊>Scientometrics >Name order patterns of graduate candidates and supervisors in Chinese publications: A case study of three major Chinese universities
【24h】

Name order patterns of graduate candidates and supervisors in Chinese publications: A case study of three major Chinese universities

机译:中文出版物中研究生和监事的姓名顺序模式:以三所中国主要大学为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Studying three Chinese major universities of different type, this article attempts to validate earlier results related to authors' name order in papers co-authored by graduate candidates and their supervisors. Candidates for the doctoral degree as well as the master's degree are considered. Defining the g-ratio as the fraction of co-authored publications where the graduate student's name precedes that of the supervisor's we obtain the following results. 1) Generally, master's level g-ratios are smaller than the corresponding doctoral level g-ratios. 2) The three doctoral g-ratio time series have a common characteristic: they tend to a limiting target value of somewhat more than 80%. The master's time series of the three universities extend themselves in parallel with the doctoral time series. 3) The g-ratio of collaborative papers related to the dissertation is higher than the g-ratio of collaborative papers not related to the dissertation. This is true on the doctoral level as well as on the master's level. 4) Different disciplines have different g-ratios, representing disciplinary customs in graduate candidate-supervisor collaboration, the highest g-ratio in the doctoral case occurring in biology (except for Tsinghua University that does not offer courses in biology). 5) There exist only small differences between the g-ratios of different kinds of universities. 6) In recent years, the same candidate-supervisor collaboration patterns exist in international publications as in domestic ones. The fact that the doctoral g-ratios of all three universities are as high as 80% reflects a universal regularity in the structure of scientific collaboration between doctoral candidates and their supervisors in China.
机译:本文研究了三所中国不同类型的主要大学,试图验证由研究生候选人及其导师共同撰写的论文中有关作者姓名顺序的早期结果。考虑博士学位和硕士学位的候选人。将g比率定义为合作作者出版物的一部分,其中研究生的名字先于主管的名字,我们得到以下结果。 1)通常,硕士水平的g-比率小于相应的博士水平的g-比率。 2)三个博士的g比率时间序列具有一个共同的特征:它们趋向于将极限目标值略大于80%。三所大学的硕士时间序列与博士学位时间序列并行扩展。 3)与论文无关的合作论文的g值比与论文无关的合作论文的g值高。在博士水平和硕士水平上都是如此。 4)不同的学科具有不同的g比率,代表研究生候选人与导师协作的学科风俗,是生物学博士中最高的g比率(清华大学不提供生物学课程)。 5)不同类型大学的g比率之间只有很小的差异。 6)近年来,国际出版物中存在与国内出版物相同的候选人与主管合作的模式。这三所大学的博士率均达到80%,这反映了中国博士候选人与其指导者之间科学合作结构的普遍规律。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Scientometrics》 |2004年第1期|p. 3-18|共16页
  • 作者单位

    Henan Normal University, Xinxiang P. R. China;

    Nanjing University, Department of Information Management P. R. China;

    KHBO, Department of Industrial Sciences & Technology Zeedijk 101, B-8400 Oostende, Belgium;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 计量学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号