首页> 外文期刊>Science >Faith in science
【24h】

Faith in science

机译:科学信仰

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

"But I should be very sorry if an interpretation founded on a most conjectural scientific hypothesis were to get fastened to the text in Genesis," wrote the devout Christian physicist James Clerk Maxwell to a friend in 1876. "The rate of change of scientific hypothesis is naturally much more rapid than that of Biblical interpretations, so that if an interpretation is founded on such a hypothesis, it may help to keep the hypothesis above ground long after it ought to be buried and forgotten." Maxwell's words were characteristically subtle. His first sentence suggests that his major concern was in protecting the integrity of Biblical scriptures, implying that serious damage could occur should these texts be linked to speculative scientific hypotheses that subsequently proved untenable. His second sentence, however, strongly suggests that any such bonding of conjectural scientific hypothesis to scriptural text would actually damage the progress of science.
机译:一位虔诚的基督教物理学家詹姆斯·克莱克·麦克斯韦(James Clerk Maxwell)于1876年向一位朋友写道:“但是,如果要把基于最推测性的科学假设的解释固定在创世记上的文本,我将感到非常抱歉。”它比圣经的解释自然要快得多,因此,如果基于这样的假设进行解释,那么在该假设被掩埋和遗忘很久之后,可能有助于将假设保持在地面之上。”麦克斯韦的话特有的微妙之处。他的第一句话表明,他的主要关注点在于保护圣经经文的完整性,这意味着如果将这些文本与后来被证明是站不住脚的投机性科学假设联系起来,可能会造成严重损害。然而,他的第二句话强烈暗示,将推测性科学假设与经文联系起来的任何这种结合实际上都会损害科学的进步。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science》 |2015年第6228期|1321-1321|共1页
  • 作者

    Crosbie Smith;

  • 作者单位

    The reviewer is at the University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NZ, UK;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:52:01

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号