首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Backshore nourishment of a beach degraded by off-road vehicles: Ecological impacts and benefits
【24h】

Backshore nourishment of a beach degraded by off-road vehicles: Ecological impacts and benefits

机译:越野车的背骨营养退化了越野车:生态影响和益处

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Worldwide, spoil from maintenance dredging of navigation channels is increasingly used to opportunistically nourish beaches. This is often justified on the presumption that nourishment will improve public beach amenity and restore sandy beach habitat. However, this is not necessarily the case, especially for beaches that do not have an immediate threat of significant erosion. We addressed the ecological impacts and benefits of a backshore sand nourishment project conducted along an off-road vehicle (ORV) damaged section of Blacksmiths Beach, New South Wales, Australia. Sediment sourced from dredging the inlet of nearby Lake Macquarie, was placed on the foredune, ORVs were excluded and low-density vegetation was planted. Sampling before and after the management interventions, at the Impact (nourished) site, two Control sites (with ORVs), and two Reference sites (without ORVs), assessed ecological impacts of nourishment and the efficacy of the interventions in rehabilitating vegetation and invertebrate communities degraded by ORVs. Nourishment initially had large negative impacts on vegetation cover, as well as on invertebrate abundance and richness. Recovery to a pre-nourished state was, however, observed for vegetation cover after 9 months and invertebrate communities after 21 months. Nevertheless, by the end of our study that extended 21 months post-nourishment and ORV exclusion, there was no evidence of change in the nourished site towards the state of Reference sites. Overall, our study suggests that small-scale backshore sand nourishments of ocean beaches may have only short-term negative impacts on foredune ecosystems when accompanied with some replanting. Nevertheless, where the frequency of sand disposals is greater than the required recovery time, or cumulative effects amass, longer-term or sustained impacts may occur. Our study does not support the efficacy of sand nourishment as a tool for ecological restoration, at least in the short term, without sustained replanting and weeding efforts aimed at reinstating the vegetation community.
机译:在全球范围内,来自航行渠道的维护疏浚掠夺越来越多地习惯于机会滋养海滩。这通常是关于营养营造将改善公共海滩舒适度和恢复沙滩栖息地的假设。然而,这不一定是这种情况,特别是对于没有显着侵蚀的直接威胁的海滩。我们解决了沿着越野车辆(ORV)澳大利亚新南威尔士州海滩的越野车(ORV)受损部分进行的后岸沙子营养项目的生态影响和益处。沉积从疏浚麦夸里湖的入口疏浚,被置于常规,排除锻造的orvs,种植了低密度植被。在管理干预之前和之后的采样,在影响(营养)网站,两个控制网站(带orvs)和两个参考网站(没有orvs),评估了营养的生态影响以及干预们在恢复植被和无脊椎动物社区中的疗效通过orvs降级。营养最初对植被覆盖以及无脊椎动物丰富和丰富性带来了大量的负面影响。然而,恢复到预营养状态,在21个月后植被覆盖以植被覆盖。尽管如此,到我们的研究结束时,营养后21个月和orv排除,没有证据表明营养场所朝向参考资料的状态。总体而言,我们的研究表明,当伴随着一些重新种植时,海洋海滩的小尺寸后岸砂营养可能只对伪造生态系统进行短期负面影响。然而,在砂性处理的频率大于所需的恢复时间,或者可能发生累积效应,可能发生长期或持续影响。我们的研究并不支持沙子营养作为生态恢复工具的疗效,至少在短期内,没有持续的补充和旨在恢复植被群落的杂草努力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号