首页> 外文期刊>Science of the total environment >Are lead-free hunting rifle bullets as effective at killing wildlife as conventional lead bullets? A comparison based on wound size and morphology
【24h】

Are lead-free hunting rifle bullets as effective at killing wildlife as conventional lead bullets? A comparison based on wound size and morphology

机译:无铅狩猎步枪子弹在杀死野生生物方面是否像常规铅子弹一样有效?基于伤口大小和形态的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Fragmentation of the lead core of conventional wildlife hunting rifle bullets causes contamination of the target with lead. The community of scavenger species which feed on carcasses or viscera discarded by hunters are regularly exposed to these lead fragments and may die by acute or chronic lead intoxication, as demonstrated for numerous species such as white-tailed eagles (Haliaeetus albicilla) where it is among the most important sources of mortality. Not only does hunting with conventional ammunition deposit lead in considerable quantities in the environment, it also significantly delays or threatens the recovery of endangered raptor populations. Although lead-free bullets might be considered a suitable alternative that addresses the source of these problems, serious reservations have been expressed as to their ability to quickly and effectively kill a hunted animal. To assess the suitability of lead-free projectiles for hunting practice, the wounding potential of conventional bullets was compared with lead-free bullets under real life hunting conditions. Wound dimensions were regarded as good markers of the projectiles' killing potential. Wound channels in 34 killed wild ungulates were evaluated using computed tomography and post-mortem macroscopical examination. Wound diameters caused by conventional bullets did not differ significantly to those created by lead-free bullets. Similarly, the size of the maximum cross-sectional area of the wound was similar for both bullet types. Injury patterns suggested that all animals died by exsanguination. This study demonstrates that lead-free bullets are equal to conventional hunting bullets in terms of killing effectiveness and thus equally meet the welfare requirements of killing wildlife as painlessly as possible. The widespread introduction and use of lead-free bullets should be encouraged as it prevents environmental contamination with a seriously toxic pollutant and contributes to the conservation of a wide variety of threatened or endangered raptors and other members of the guild of scavengers.
机译:传统野生动植物狩猎步枪子弹的铅芯破裂会导致靶标被铅污染。以猎人遗弃的尸体或内脏为食的清道夫物种群落经常暴露于这些铅碎片,并可能因急性或慢性铅中毒而死亡,如许多物种如白尾鹰(Haliaeetus albicilla)所证明的那样。最重要的死亡率来源。使用常规弹药沉积物狩猎不仅会在环境中导致大量捕食,还会大大延迟或威胁到濒临灭绝的猛禽种群的恢复。尽管无铅子弹可能被认为是解决这些问题根源的合适替代品,但对于它们快速有效地杀死被猎杀动物的能力表示了严重的保留。为了评估无铅弹丸在狩猎中的适用性,将常规子弹在无人驾驶情况下的伤势与无铅子弹进行了比较。伤口尺寸被认为是射弹杀伤力的良好标志。使用计算机断层扫描和验尸后的肉眼检查,评估了34只被杀死的野生有蹄类动物的伤口通道。常规子弹造成的伤口直径与无铅子弹产生的直径没有太大差异。类似地,两种子弹类型的伤口最大横截面积的大小相似。损伤模式表明所有动物都因放血而死亡。这项研究表明,无铅子弹在杀灭效力方面与传统的狩猎子弹相当,因此可以尽可能无痛地满足杀灭野生动物的福利要求。应鼓励广泛引入和使用无铅子弹,因为它可以防止环境污染并产生剧毒污染物,并有助于保护各种濒临灭绝的猛禽和清道夫协会的其他成员。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science of the total environment》 |2013年第15期|226-232|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, P.O. 601103, D-10252 Berlin, Germany,Food and Feed Control Authority of the county of Havelland (Landkreis Havelland, Amt fuer Landwirtschaft, Veterinaer- und Lebensmittelueberwachung), Goethestr. 59/60, D-14641 Nauen, Germany;

    Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, P.O. 601103, D-10252 Berlin, Germany;

    Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, P.O. 601103, D-10252 Berlin, Germany;

    Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, P.O. 601103, D-10252 Berlin, Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    computed tomography; game animals; lead poisoning; rifle bullets; sustainable hunting; wounding potential;

    机译:CT检查;游戏动物;铅中毒;步枪子弹可持续狩猎;伤人的潜力;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号