首页> 外文期刊>School Science and Mathematics >'Natural Philosophy' as a Foundation for Science Education in an Age of High-Stakes Accountability
【24h】

'Natural Philosophy' as a Foundation for Science Education in an Age of High-Stakes Accountability

机译:高分责任制时代的“自然哲学”作为科学教育的基础

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Science curriculum and instruction in K-12 settings in the United States is currently dominated by an emphasis on the science standards movement of the 1990s and the resulting standards-based high-stakes assessment and accountability movement of the 2000s. We argue that this focus has moved the field away from important philosophical understandings of science teaching and learning that have their roots in the history of both learning theory and scientific discovery. We offer a philosophical argument, as well as a model for implementation, grounded in the 19th century notion of "natural philosophy," as well as Dewean progressivism and Piaget's notion of reconstruction through rediscovery, for the important place of the history of science in modern science education. We provide curricular examples of this model, as well as a discussion of how it might be implemented as part of teacher education. We focus our discussion on the elementary and middle school grades, because teachers at these levels tend to have more limited science content knowledge than their secondary school peers, making them more dependent upon curricular materials and thus more heavily influenced by curricular reforms.
机译:目前,在美国以K-12训练的科学课程和教学中,重点是1990年代的科学标准运动以及由此产生的2000年代基于标准的高风险评估和问责制运动。我们认为,这一关注点使该领域脱离了对科学教学的重要哲学理解,这些哲学理解源于学习理论和科学发现的历史。我们以19世纪的“自然哲学”概念,杜威进步主义和通过重新发现进行的皮亚杰重建概念为基础,为现代科学史的重要地位提供哲学论证和实施模型。科学教育。我们提供了该模型的课程示例,并讨论了如何在教师教育中实施该模型。我们将讨论的重点放在小学和中学的年级,因为与中学同龄人相比,这些级别的老师往往对科学内容的知识更加有限,这使他们更加依赖于课程资料,因此受到课程改革的影响更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号