...
首页> 外文期刊>Road Traffic Reports >TINDALL v CHIEF CONSTABLE OF THAMES VALLEY POLICE
【24h】

TINDALL v CHIEF CONSTABLE OF THAMES VALLEY POLICE

机译:Tindall V泰晤士河谷警察的主席

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

H2 After a motorist had skidded off a country road on black ice formed from water leaking and flooding the road, he was concerned that other vehicles might also encounter the unexpected ice and have accidents. He accordingly started to warn approaching vehicles, and, when the police attended, he stressed to them that the situation was dangerous. The police put out a warning sign while the debris from the motorist's accident was cleared, but removed it once that had been done and took no steps to warn motorists of the hazard created by the ice. Not long afterwards, as the claimant's husband was driving along that stretch of road, an oncoming motorist lost control of his vehicle on the ice and collided head on with the claimant's husband. Both drivers were killed. A police disciplinary tribunal found the police officers who had attended the original accident guilty of misconduct, and the inquest found that more should have been done by both the police and the highway authority. The claimant brought proceedings in negligence against the chief constable and the highway authority, contending that by removing the original motorist from the scene, and not leaving the road safe, the police officers had made matters worse than if they had not attended.
机译:H2驾驶员在一条乡村公路上滑过一条乡村道路,在泄漏和洪水道路上形成,他担心其他车辆也可能遇到意外的冰并有意外。因此,他开始怀疑接近的车辆,并且当警方出席时,他强调了他们的情况是危险的。警方宣布警告标志,而驾驶者事故的碎片被清除,但曾经已经完成过,没有步骤警告冰灾害的驾驶者。之后不久,正如索赔人的丈夫沿着那种道路驾驶的那样,一个迎面而来的驾驶者在冰上失去了他的车辆,并与索赔人的丈夫相撞。两个司机都被杀死了。警方纪律处女审裁处发现了参加原始事故的警察犯了不当行为,而调查则发现,警察和公路管理局都应该做更多。索赔人为疏忽诉讼,负责人和公路管理局带来了疏忽,争夺了从现场去除原来的驾驶者,而不是离开道路安全,警察已经比没有参加的话更糟糕。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号