首页> 外文期刊>Research in Science Education >Instructional Efficiency of Tutoring in an Outreach Gene Technology Laboratory
【24h】

Instructional Efficiency of Tutoring in an Outreach Gene Technology Laboratory

机译:外联基因技术实验室的教学指导效率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Our research objective focused on examining the instructional efficiency of tutoring as a form of instructional change as opposed to a non-tutoring approach in an outreach laboratory. We designed our laboratory based on cognitive load (CL) theory. Altogether, 269 twelfth-graders participated in our day-long module Genetic Fingerprinting. In a quasi-experimental design, the control group (n = 121) followed the non-tutoring approach previously used, while the treatment group (n = 148) followed the newly developed tutoring approach. Each tutor was in charge of two student work groups and recorded the tutoring activities requested by the tutees throughout the day. We measured the students’ invested mental effort (as an index of CL), cognitive achievement (in a pre-post-follow-up design), and the students’ cooperation in their work groups as well as calculated the student instructional involvement (as a motivational variable). Additionally, we examined which aspects of the hands-on phases were of particular relevance to the students’ invested mental effort. Unexpectedly, the combined mental effort and cognitive achievement data indicated that our implemented tutoring approach resulted in a lower instructional efficiency despite the relevance of tutoring for students’ mental effort invested during the experimental phases. Most of the tutor assistance was unnecessarily requested for performing the procedural steps and using the equipment. Our results indicate an assistance dilemma and consequently underscore the necessity for effective tutor preparation in outreach laboratories.
机译:我们的研究目标侧重于检查作为一种教学变更形式的补习的教学效率,而不是外展实验室中的非补习方法。我们基于认知负荷(CL)理论设计了实验室。共有269位12年级学生参加了我们为期一天的遗传指纹模块。在准实验设计中,对照组(n = 121)遵循以前使用的非辅导方法,而治疗组(n = 148)遵循新开发的辅导方法。每个导师负责两个学生工作组,并记录了全天全天学生要求的辅导活动。我们测量了学生的投入精神努力(作为CL的指标),认知成就(在后续研究之前的设计中)以及学生在工作小组中的合作,并计算了学生的教学投入(如动机变量)。此外,我们检查了动手阶段的哪些方面与学生投入的脑力劳动特别相关。出乎意料的是,合并的心理努力和认知成就数据表明,尽管在实验阶段进行辅导与学生的智力投入相关,但我们实施的辅导方法导致较低的教学效率。不必要地要求大多数辅导老师来执行程序步骤和使用设备。我们的结果表明存在援助困境,因此强调了在扩展实验室中有效准备导师的必要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号