首页> 外文期刊>Reference & User Services Quarterly >Preference for Reference: New Options and Choices for Academic Library Users
【24h】

Preference for Reference: New Options and Choices for Academic Library Users

机译:优先参考:高校图书馆用户的新选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This exploratory study investigated the help-seeking preferences of library users at two large urban universities in Toronto. Reference desk and virtual reference users were compared in terms of their perceptions of the options now available for obtaining reference help. The premise for the study was based on the assumption that a reasonable exposure to newer-reference services, such as chat and e-mail, had occurred, therefore allowing for an examination of emerging preferences for different types of services. Surveys were distributed to both reference desk and virtual reference users asking seven core questions exploring use and preference for reference services as well as habits and preferences for study location (in library, off campus, etc.). The results suggest that the reference desk continues to be the most popular method of getting help in the library, but virtual reference satisfies a niche for users who prefer to work outside the library. Those who use virtual reference tend to perceive their options for getting help differently from other users. Virtual reference users do not perceive virtual reference as a novelty or as a marginal service, but see it as a significant service option. In addition, the results show that virtual reference services may have a special appeal to graduate students since graduate students seem more likely to conduct their research outside the library. The study concludes with recommendations for planning and for future research.
机译:这项探索性研究调查了多伦多两所大型城市大学图书馆用户的求助偏好。比较了参考咨询台和虚拟参考咨询用户对他们现在可用于获得参考帮助的选项的看法。该研究的前提是基于这样的假设,即已经合理地使用了诸如聊天和电子邮件之类的新参考服务,因此可以检查对不同类型服务的新兴偏好。调查被分发给咨询台和虚拟咨询用户,询问七个核心问题,以探索参考服务的使用和偏好以及学习地点(在图书馆,校外等)的习惯和偏好。结果表明,咨询台仍然是在图书馆中获得帮助的最受欢迎的方法,但是虚拟咨询对那些喜欢在图书馆外工作的用户来说是一个利基市场。那些使用虚拟参考的人倾向于以不同于其他用户的方式感知他们获得帮助的选择。虚拟参考用户不会将虚拟参考视为新颖性或边际服务,而是将其视为重要的服务选项。此外,结果表明,虚拟参考咨询服务可能对研究生特别有吸引力,因为研究生似乎更可能在图书馆外进行研究。该研究最后提出了有关规划和未来研究的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号