首页> 外文期刊>Reading and Writing >Reading in two orthographies: A cross-linguistic study of Dutch average and poor readers who learn English as a second language
【24h】

Reading in two orthographies: A cross-linguistic study of Dutch average and poor readers who learn English as a second language

机译:在两个拼字法中阅读:对荷兰普通语言和学习英语作为第二语言的贫困读者的跨语言研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The present study investigated the reading of secondary school students in their first and second language (L1, L2). Twenty-six average and twenty-six poor readers matched on age, gender, listening and reading comprehension participated. They were native Dutch speakers who started learning English at secondary school (grade 7). We examined whether differences in L2 between the two groups reflect differences in L1 with regard to reading and relevant subskills. In addition, the relationship between reading and its predictors within and across the two languages was investigated. Between group differences were similar in L1 and L2 when task conditions involved high levels of phonological and orthographic complexity or demanded speeded processing. Furthermore, serial rapid naming predicted speeded word reading in both languages and L2 text reading accuracy, while L2 phoneme awareness and orthographic knowledge explained unique variance in L2 text reading accuracy. Cross-linguistic prediction revealed that speeded word reading predicted its counterpart from L1 to L2 and vice versa. Serial rapid naming explained additional variance in the prediction of L2 from L1. After exclusion of the reading predictor from the model, serial rapid naming was the most consistent cross-linguistic predictor, while L2 orthographic knowledge explained a small amount of unique variance in L1 speeded word reading.
机译:本研究调查了中学生以第一和第二语言(L1,L2)阅读的情况。在年龄,性别,听力和阅读理解方面,平均有26名贫困读者和26名贫困读者参加了比赛。他们是荷兰语母语人士,他们从中学(7年级)开始学习英语。我们检查了两组之间L2的差异是否反映了L1在阅读和相关亚技能方面的差异。此外,还研究了两种语言之内和之间的阅读及其预测变量之间的关系。当任务条件涉及高水平的语音和拼写复杂性或需要加快处理速度时,小组之间的差异在L1和L2中相似。此外,串行快速命名可以预测两种语言中的单词阅读速度以及L2文本阅读的准确性,而L2音素意识和正字法知识可以解释L2文本阅读准确性的独特差异。跨语言预测显示,快速单词阅读可以预测其对应词从L1到L2,反之亦然。串行快速命名解释了从L1预测L2时的其他方差。从模型中排除阅读预测因子后,串行快速命名是最一致的跨语言预测因子,而L2拼字法知识解释了L1加速单词阅读中的少量独特差异。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Reading and Writing》 |2007年第8期|753-784|共32页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Educational Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Wibautstraat 4, 1091, GM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;

    Department of Educational Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Wibautstraat 4, 1091, GM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;

    Department of Educational Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Wibautstraat 4, 1091, GM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;

    Department of Educational Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Wibautstraat 4, 1091, GM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;

    Department of Educational Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Wibautstraat 4, 1091, GM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Poor readers; Phonological skills; Orthography; Second language;

    机译:贫穷的读者;语音技能;拼字法;第二语言;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:17:16

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号