首页> 外文期刊>Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology >Contrast effects in typicality judgements: A hierarchical Bayesian approach
【24h】

Contrast effects in typicality judgements: A hierarchical Bayesian approach

机译:典型性判断中的对比效果:分级贝叶斯方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We examine the influence of contrast categories on the internal graded membership structure of everyday concepts using computational models proposed in the artificial category learning tradition. In particular, the generalized context model (Nosofsky, 1986), which assumes that only members of a given category contribute to the typicality of a category member, is contrasted to the similarity-dissimilarity generalized context model (SD-GCM; Stewart & Brown, 2005), which assumes that members of other categories are also influential in determining typicality. The models are compared in a hierarchical Bayesian framework in their account of the typicality gradient of five animal categories and six artefact categories. For each target category, we consider all possible relevant contrast categories. Three separate issue are examined: (a) whether contrast effects can be found, (b) which categories are responsible for these effects, and (c) whether more than one category influences the typicality. Results indicate that the internal category structure is codetermined by dissimilarity towards potential contrast categories. In most cases, only a single contrast category contributed to the typicality. The present findings suggest that contrast effects might be more widespread than has previously been assumed. Further, they stress the importance of characteristics particular of everyday concepts, which require careful consideration when applying computational models of representation of the artificial category learning tradition to everyday concepts.View full textDownload full textKeywordsConcepts, Categories, Typicality, Contrast effects, Computational modelling of behavioural dataRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.662237
机译:我们使用人工类别学习传统中提出的计算模型来检查对比类别对日常概念的内部分级成员结构的影响。特别是,广义上下文模型(Nosofsky,1986年)假设只有给定类别的成员才有助于类别成员的典型性,而广义相似模型则与相似性-相异性广义上下文模型(SD-GCM; Stewart&Brown, (2005),假设其他类别的成员在确定典型性方面也具有影响力。在考虑到五个动物类别和六个伪像类别的典型性梯度的情况下,在层次贝叶斯框架中对模型进行了比较。对于每个目标类别,我们考虑所有可能的相关对比度类别。研究了三个独立的问题:(a)是否可以找到对比效果,(b)哪些类别导致这些效果,以及(c)是否有一个以上的类别影响典型性。结果表明内部类别结构由与潜在对比类别的不相似性决定。在大多数情况下,只有一个对比类别有助于典型性。目前的发现表明,对比效果可能比以前的假设更为广泛。此外,他们强调了日常概念特有的重要性,在将人工类别学习传统表示的计算模型应用于日常概念时需要仔细考虑。查看全文下载全文关键字概念,类别,典型性,对比效果,行为的计算模型dataRelated var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.662237

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号