首页> 外文期刊>The quarterly journal of experimental psychology: QJEP >Contrast effects in typicality judgements: A hierarchical Bayesian approach
【24h】

Contrast effects in typicality judgements: A hierarchical Bayesian approach

机译:典型判断中的对比效果:分层贝叶斯方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We examine the influence of contrast categories on the internal graded membership structure of everyday concepts using computational models proposed in the artificial category learning tradition. In particular, the generalized context model (Nosofsky, 1986), which assumes that only members of a given category contribute to the typicality of a category member, is contrasted to the similarity-dissimilarity generalized context model (SD-GCM; Stewart & Brown, 2005), which assumes that members of other categories are also influential in determining typicality. The models are compared in a hierarchical Bayesian framework in their account of the typicality gradient of five animal categories and six artefact categories. For each target category, we consider all possible relevant contrast categories. Three separate issue are examined: (a) whether contrast effects can be found, (b) which categories are responsible for these effects, and (c) whether more than one category influences the typicality. Results indicate that the internal category structure is codetermined by dissimilarity towards potential contrast categories. In most cases, only a single contrast category contributed to the typicality. The present findings suggest that contrast effects might be more widespread than has previously been assumed. Further, they stress the importance of characteristics particular of everyday concepts, which require careful consideration when applying computational models of representation of the artificial category learning tradition to everyday concepts.
机译:我们使用人工类别学习传统提出的计算模型来研究对比度类别对日常概念的内部分级员工结构的影响。特别地,假设仅给定类别的成员有助于类别成员的典型性的广义上下文模型(Nosofsky,1986)与相似性 - 异化广义上下文模型(SD-GCM; Stewart&Brown, 2005年)假设其他类别的成员在确定典型程度时也会有影响力。这些模型在其账户中与分层贝叶斯框架进行了比较了五个动物类别和六个人工制品类别的典型梯度。对于每个目标类别,我们考虑所有可能的相关对比类别。检查了三个单独的问题:(a)是否可以找到对比度效果,(b)哪些类别对这些效果负责,并且(c)多个类别是否影响典型程度。结果表明,内部类别结构因对潜在对比类别而异的异常。在大多数情况下,只有一个对比度类别贡献典型。本研究结果表明,对比效果可能比以前所假设更广泛。此外,它们强调了特征特别是日常概念的重要性,这需要仔细考虑,当将人工类别学习传统的代表的计算模型应用于日常概念时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号