首页> 外文期刊>Quality in Higher Education >Institutional research and improving the quality of student engagement
【24h】

Institutional research and improving the quality of student engagement

机译:机构研究和提高学生参与质量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article asks whether institutional research could help improve the quality of student engagement by researching at sub-institutional levels such as in courses bridging students from school into higher education. In answer it argues two interacting propositions: one, that student engagement provides useful indicators of quality in higher education; and, two, that research into student engagement is best conducted at a sub-institutional level. The authors use evidence obtained from a funded Teaching and Learning Research Initiative project in New Zealand to support these propositions. The project gauged the perceptions of first-time students in four different bridging (access) courses in one higher education institution. Results showed significant differences in the way they perceived the efforts of teachers and the institution to support their engagement. Not only did course results differ from institutional scores, courses also differed significantly from each other. These results suggest that the quality of student engagement could be enhanced if institutional research focused closely on engagement at sub-institutional levels such as courses.View full textDownload full textKeywordsquality, student engagement, institutional research, higher educationRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2012.730338
机译:本文询问机构研究是否可以通过在子机构级别进行研究(例如在使学生从学校进入高等教育的课程中)来帮助提高学生的参与质量。在回答中,它提出了两个相互影响的主张:一是学生的参与度为高等教育的质量提供了有用的指标;二是学生的参与度为高等教育提供了有用的指标。第二,对学生参与度的研究最好在次机构级别进行。作者使用从新西兰教与学研究计划资助的项目中获得的证据来支持这些主张。该项目评估了一家高等教育机构在四门不同的衔接(访问)课程中对初学者的看法。结果表明,他们对教师和机构为支持他们的参与所做的努力的看法存在显着差异。课程结果不仅与机构分数不同,而且课程之间也存在显着差异。这些结果表明,如果机构研究密切关注诸如课程之类的子机构级别的参与,则可以提高学生的参与质量。查看全文下载全文关键字质量,学生参与,机构研究,高等教育相关变量var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒&Francis Online”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2012.730338

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号