首页> 外文期刊>Quality Assurance in Education >Studying critical classroom encounters: The experiences of students in German college education
【24h】

Studying critical classroom encounters: The experiences of students in German college education

机译:研究重要的课堂遭遇:德国大学教育中学生的经历

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose – This paper seeks to explore satisfactory and unsatisfactory classroom (student-lecturer) encounters in higher education from a student's perspective. Design/methodology/approach – The critical incident technique (CIT) is used to categorise positive and negative student-lecturer interactions, to reveal quality dimensions of the lecturer, and to reconsider which attributes of the lecturer are likely to cause satisfaction and which dimensions mainly lead to dissatisfaction. The study took place at a large commercial college. A total of 225 students took part in the study on a voluntary basis and reported 429 incidents. Respondents were aged between 16 and 21 years (mean age?=?17.8). On average, every student provided 1.9 incidents. Findings – The results of the CIT study manifested nine quality dimensions of lecturer behaviour, confirming previous research in this area. Quality dimensions that were mainly mentioned in the negative incidents were classified as “dissatisfiers” (“expertise”, “communication skills”, “fairness”, “assertiveness”, and “enthusiasm”), attributes that appeared in the positive incidents were labelled “satisfiers” (“flexibility”), and dimensions with a high score for both positive and incidents were described as “criticals” (“teaching skills”, “empathy”, “friendliness”). Research limitations/implications – Owing to the exploratory nature of the study and the scope and size of its student sample, the results outlined are tentative in nature. The research study also only investigates the expectations and perceptions of one stakeholder group. Practical implications – For instructors to improve students' experiences, they should address the identified “criticals” first before moving on to improving the “dissatisfiers” and then the “satisfiers”. Gaining knowledge of (deviations of) student expectations should be beneficial for lecturers to design their teaching programmes. Based on the results, colleges might consider the introduction of student contracts or student satisfaction guarantees to manage student expectations effectively. Originality/value – The study shows that the CIT method is a beneficial tool for exploring classroom encounters in higher education. The paper has hopefully opened up an area of research and methodology that could reap further substantial benefits for researchers interested in this area.
机译:目的–本文旨在从学生的角度探讨高等教育中令人满意的和不令人满意的课堂(学生讲师)。设计/方法/方法–关键事件技术(CIT)用于对正面的和负面的学生与讲师互动进行分类,以揭示讲师的素质,并重新考虑讲师的哪些属性可能引起满意度,以及主要考虑哪些方面导致不满。该研究是在一所大型商业学院进行的。共有225名学生自愿参加了这项研究,并报告了429起事件。受访者年龄在16至21岁之间(平均年龄== 17.8)。平均每个学生提供1.9次事件。调查结果– CIT研究的结果表明了讲师行为的9个质量方面,这证实了该领域以前的研究。在负面事件中主要提到的质量维度被归类为“不满意者”(“专长”,“沟通技巧”,“公平”,“自信”和“热情”),在正面事件中出现的属性被标记为“满足感”(“灵活性”),正面和事件得分均高的维度被描述为“批判性”(“教学技巧”,“同理心”,“友善”)。研究的局限性/意义–由于研究的探索性及其学生样本的范围和大小,因此概述的结果本质上是暂定的。该研究还仅调查一个利益相关者群体的期望和看法。实际意义–对于教师来说,要改善学生的体验,他们应该先解决已确定的“关键”,然后再着手改善“不满意者”,然后再改善“满意者”。掌握学生期望(偏差)的知识应有助于教师设计他们的教学计划。根据结果​​,大学可以考虑引入学生合同或学生满意度保证,以有效地管理学生的期望。原创性/价值–研究表明,CIT方法是探索高等教育中课堂遭遇的有益工具。该论文有望开辟一个研究和方法论领域,从而可以使对该领域感兴趣的研究人员获得更大的利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号