首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative Market Research >From 'me' to 'we': negotiating new family identity through meal consumption in Asian cultures
【24h】

From 'me' to 'we': negotiating new family identity through meal consumption in Asian cultures

机译:从“我”到“我们”:通过在亚洲文化中进餐来谈判新的家庭身份

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to develop a conceptual framework which deepens our understanding of identity negotiation and formation in a collectivistic Asian context. Drawing from a three-year, multi-method ethnographic research process, the authors explore how contemporary Asian consumers construct, negotiate and enact family identity through meal consumption. The authors particularly focus on the ways in which Asian consumers negotiate values, norms and practices associated with filial piety during new family formation. Building on the influential framework of layered family identity proposed by Epp and Price (2008), the authors seek to develop a framework which enables us to better understand how Asian consumers construct and enact their family identity through mundane consumption. Design/methodology/approach - As most of the identity negotiation in the domestic sphere takes place within the mundanity of everyday life, such as during the routines, rituals and conventions of "ordinary" family meals, the authors adopted an interpretive, hermeneutic and longitudinal ethnographic research approach, which drew from a purposive sample of nine Sri Lankan couples. Findings - The authors present the finding in three vivid narrative exemplars of new family identity negotiation and discuss three processes which informants negotiated the layered family identity. First, Asian families negotiate family identity by re-formulating aspects of their relational identity bundles. Second, re-negotiating facets of individual identity facilitates construction of family identity. Finally, re-configuring aspects of collective family identity, especially in relation to the extended family is important to family identity in this research context. The authors also propose filial piety as a fundamental construct of Asian family identity and highlight the importance of collective layer over individual and relational family identity layers. Research limitations/implications - The aim of this paper is to develop a conceptual framework which deepens our understanding of identity negotiation and formation in a collectivistic Asian context. Even though exploring Sinhalese, Sri Lankan culture sheds light on understanding identity and consumption in other similar Asian cultures, such as Indian, Chinese and Korean; this paper does not suggest generalisability of findings to similar research contexts. On the contrary, the findings aim to present an in-depth discussion of how identities are challenged, negotiated and re-formulated during new family formation around specific consumption behaviours associated with filial piety in a collectivistic extended family. Social implications - As this research explores tightly knit relationships in extended families and how these families negotiate values, norms and practices associated with filial piety, it enables us to understand the complex ways in which Asian families negotiate identity. The proposed framework could be useful to explore how changing social dynamics challenge the traditional sense of family in these collectivistic cultures and how they affect family happiness and well-being. Such insight is useful for public policymakers and social marketers when addressing family dissatisfaction-based social issues in Asia, such as increasing rates of suicide, divorce, child abuse, prostitution and sexually transmitted disease. Originality/value - Little is known about the complex ways in which Asian family identities are negotiated in contrast to Western theoretical models on this topic. Particularly, we need to understand how fundamental aspects of Asian family identity, such as filial piety, are continuously re-negotiated, manifested and perpetuated during everyday life and how formulations of Asian family identity may be different from its predominantly Western conceptualisations. Therefore, the paper provides an adaptation to the current layered family identity model and proposes filial piety as a fundamental construct driving Asian family identity.
机译:目的-本文的目的是建立一个概念框架,加深我们对亚洲集体主义背景下的身份协商和形成的理解。作者通过一项为期三年的多方法民族志研究过程,探索了当代亚洲消费者如何通过进餐来构建,协商和确立家庭身份。作者特别关注亚洲消费者在新家庭形成期间如何与孝道相关的价值观,规范和做法进行谈判。在Epp和Price(2008)提出的有影响力的分层家庭认同框架的基础上,作者寻求建立一个框架,使我们能够更好地了解亚洲消费者如何通过平凡的消费来构建和体现其家庭身份。设计/方法/方法-由于家庭领域中的大多数身份协商都是在日常生活中进行的,例如在“普通”家庭进餐的例行,仪式和惯例中,作者采用了解释性,解释性和纵向性人种志研究方法,该研究方法是从9个斯里兰卡夫妇的目标样本中得出的。调查结果-作者在新的家庭身份协商的三个生动的叙事示例中介绍了这一发现,并讨论了线人协商分层家庭身份的三个过程。首先,亚洲家庭通过重新制定其关系身份组合的各个方面来协商家庭身份。其次,重新协商个人身份的各个方面有助于建立家庭身份。最后,在此研究背景下,重新配置集体家庭身份的各个方面,尤其是与大家庭有关的方面,对于家庭身份至关重要。作者还提出孝道是亚洲家庭身份的基本构成,并强调了集体层次对个​​人和关系家庭身份层次的重要性。研究的局限性/意义-本文的目的是建立一个概念框架,加深我们对亚洲集体主义背景下身份协商和形成的理解。即使探索僧伽罗语,斯里兰卡文化也使人们了解了印度,中国和韩国等其他亚洲相似文化中的身份和消费。本文并未建议将研究结果推广到类似的研究环境。相反,这些发现旨在针对集体大家庭中与孝道相关的特定消费行为,围绕新的家庭形成过程中的身份挑战,谈判和重新形成方式进行深入讨论。社会意义-这项研究探索大家庭中的亲密关系,以及这些家庭如何协商与孝道相关的价值观,规范和做法,这使我们能够了解亚洲家庭协商身份的复杂方式。拟议的框架可能有助于探讨不断变化的社会动力如何在这些集体主义文化中挑战传统的家庭观念,以及它们如何影响家庭的幸福和福祉。在解决亚洲基于家庭不满的社会问题,例如自杀,离婚,虐待儿童,卖淫和性传播疾病的发生率上升时,这种见识对于公共政策制定者和社会营销人员很有用。原创性/价值-与西方在这一主题上的理论模型相比,关于亚洲家庭身份的复杂谈判方式知之甚少。特别是,我们需要了解亚洲家庭认同的基本方面,例如孝道在日常生活中如何不断地被重新谈判,体现和延续,以及亚洲家庭认同的表述可能与以西方为主的观念有何不同。因此,本文提供了对当前分层家庭身份模型的适应,并提出了孝顺作为驱动亚洲家庭身份的基本结构。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号