首页> 外文期刊>Public choice >Rivalry and superior dispatch: an analysis of competing courts in medieval and early modern England;
【24h】

Rivalry and superior dispatch: an analysis of competing courts in medieval and early modern England;

机译:竞争与派遣:对中世纪和近代早期英格兰竞争性法院的分析;

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In most areas, economists look to competition to align incentives, but not so with courts. Many believe that competition enables plaintiff forum shopping, but Adam Smith praised rivalry among courts. This article describes the courts when the common law developed. In many areas of law, courts were monopolized and imposed decisions on unwilling participants. In other areas, however, large degrees of competition and consent were present. In many areas, local, hundred, manorial, county, ecclesiastical, law merchant, chancery, and common law courts competed for customers. When parties had a choice, courts needed to provide a forum that was ex ante value maximizing.
机译:在大多数领域,经济学家都希望通过竞争来调整激励措施,但法院却并非如此。许多人认为竞争可以促进原告论坛的购物,但是亚当·斯密(Adam Smith)称赞法院之间的竞争。本文介绍了普通法制定时的法院。在许多法律领域,法院被垄断,并对不愿意的参与者施加判决。但是,在其他领域,存在很大程度的竞争和同意。在许多地区,地方法院,一百法院,庄园法院,县法院,教会法院,法律商人法院,司法法院和普通法院都在争夺客户。当当事人有选择权时,法院需要提供一个事前价值最大化的论坛。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号