首页> 外文期刊>Psychoanalytic Dialogues >We: Commentary on Papers by Trevarthen, Ammaniti & Trentini, and Gallese
【24h】

We: Commentary on Papers by Trevarthen, Ammaniti & Trentini, and Gallese

机译:我们:Trevarthen,Ammaniti和Trentini和Gallese对论文的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In my discussion of papers by Trevarthen, Ammaniti & Trentini, and Gallese, I situate their work within an emerging paradigm of intersubjectivity. This new model finds philosophic grounding in the work of the phenomenologists (Husserl, Merleau-Ponty, Nancy) as it draws from the multiple sources that come together to comprise the new field of cognitive and affective neurosciences. These papers hold the potential to make relational psychoanalysis more relational by providing new foundations for rethinking the biological, developmental and clinical. What emerges is an intersubjective theory based in motor action and perception that serves as the embodied basis for human culture and community, a shared “we” space of basic human affinity. I extend this conception into the analytic setting with a brief introduction to enactive participation in clinical process.
机译:在我对Trevarthen,Ammaniti&Trentini和Gallese的论文的讨论中,我将他们的工作置于新兴的主体间性范式之内。这个新模型是从现象学家(胡塞尔,梅洛-庞蒂,南希)的现象学中找到哲学基础的,因为它是从多种来源汇集而来的,构成了认知和情感神经科学的新领域。这些论文通过为重新思考生物学,发育和临床提供新的基础,具有使关系心理分析更具关系性的潜力。出现的是基于运动行为和感知的主体间理论,它是人类文化和社区(人类基本亲和力的共享“我们”空间)的体现基础。我将这一概念扩展到分析环境中,并简要介绍了积极参与临床过程。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Psychoanalytic Dialogues》 |2009年第5期|565-579|共15页
  • 作者

    Bruce Reis;

  • 作者单位

    New York University Postdoctoral Program in Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis,;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:51:37

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号