首页> 外文期刊>Production and operations management >Category Captainship vs. Retailer Category Management under Limited Retail Shelf Space
【24h】

Category Captainship vs. Retailer Category Management under Limited Retail Shelf Space

机译:有限的货架空间下的类别能力与零售商类别管理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Shelf-space scarcity is a predominant aspect of the consumer goods industry. This paper analyzes its implications for category management. We consider a model where two competing manufacturers sell their differentiated products through a single retailer who determines the shelf space allocated to the category. The scope of category management is pricing. We consider two category management mechanisms: retailer category management (RCM), where the retailer determines product prices and category captainship (CC), where a manufacturer in the category determines them. Our analysis reveals that the retailer can use the form of category management and the category shelf space to control the intensity of competition between manufacturers to his benefit. We also show that the emergence of CC depends on the degree of product differentiation, the opportunity cost of shelf space, and the profit sharing arrangement in the alliance. The equilibrium category shelf space under CC may be higher than under RCM if the value to the retailer of eliminating double margin-alization and putting price pressure on the non-captain manufacturer dominates the loss from sharing the profit with the category captain. CC has been criticized for disadvantaging non-captain manufacturers. While we provide some support for this claim, we also find that CC may benefit non-captain manufacturers when implemented by a powerful retailer in categories with sufficiently differentiated products, because the shelf space allocated to the category increases in this case.
机译:货架空缺是消费品行业的主要方面。本文分析了其对类别管理的意义。我们考虑一个模型,其中两个竞争的制造商通过一个零售商来销售差异化产品,该零售商确定分配给该类别的货架空间。类别管理的范围是定价。我们考虑两种类别管理机制:零售商类别管理(RCM),其中零售商确定产品价格,类别领导力(CC),其中类别中的制造商确定价格。我们的分析表明,零售商可以使用类别管理和类别货架空间的形式来控制制造商之间的竞争强度,以使自己受益。我们还表明,CC的出现取决于产品差异化的程度,货架空间的机会成本以及联盟中的利润共享安排。如果消除双重边际化和对非船长制造商施加价格压力的零售商的价值占零售商与船长分担利润的损失的主导地位,那么CC下的平衡类货架空间可能会比RCM下更大。 CC已因不利于非船长制造商而受到批评。尽管我们对此主张提供了一些支持,但我们还发现,如果由强大的零售商在产品类别充分不同的类别中由强大的零售商实施,CC可能会使非船长制造商受益,因为在这种情况下分配给该类别的货架空间会增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号