首页> 外文期刊>Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences >The ‘theory theory’ of mind and the aims of Sellars’ original myth of Jones
【24h】

The ‘theory theory’ of mind and the aims of Sellars’ original myth of Jones

机译:心智的“理论理论”和塞勒斯的琼斯神话的目的

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recent proponents of the ‘theory theory’ of mind often trace its roots back to Wilfrid Sellars’ famous ‘myth of Jones’ in his 1956 article, ‘Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind’. Sellars developed an account of the intersubjective basis of our knowledge of the inner mental states of both self and others, an account which included the claim that such knowledge is in some sense theoretical knowledge. This paper examines the nature of this claim in Sellars’ original account and its relationship to more recent debates concerning ‘theory of mind’, in particular the theory theory. A close look reveals that Sellars’ original view embodied several distinctions that would enable more recent theory theorists to accommodate certain phenomenological objections that have been raised against that outlook. At the heart of the philosophical issue is an overlooked complexity involved in Sellars’ account of the ‘theory/observation’ distinction, involving a conception of the distinction that is both independently plausible and a key to the issue in dispute.
机译:心智“理论理论”的最新支持者通常可以追溯到威尔弗里德·塞拉斯(Wilfrid Sellars)在1956年发表的《经验主义和心灵哲学》一书中著名的《琼斯神话》。塞拉斯提出了关于我们关于自我和他人的内在心理状态的知识的主体间基础的描述,其中包括这样的说法,即这种知识在某种意义上是理论知识。本文研究了塞拉斯(Sellars)原始账目中这一主张的性质,以及它与最近有关“心理理论”(尤其是理论理论)的辩论之间的关系。仔细观察可以发现,塞拉斯的原始观点体现了几个区别,这将使新近的理论理论家能够适应针对这一观点提出的某些现象学反对意见。哲学问题的核心是塞拉斯对“理论/观察”区别的描述中所涉及的一种被忽视的复杂性,涉及一种区别的概念,这种区别既可以独立地合理化,也可以作为争议中问题的关键。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号