首页> 外文期刊>Parliamentary Affairs >Engagement and Participation: What the Public Want and How our Politicians Need to Respond
【24h】

Engagement and Participation: What the Public Want and How our Politicians Need to Respond

机译:参与和参与:公众想要什么以及我们的政客需要如何回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Following the parliamentary expenses scandal, an array of parliamentary and constitutional reforms has been proposed as a means to re-establish public trust and confidence in MPs and Parliament. Populist measures designed to enhance public engagement and participation through more direct and participatory decision-making mechanisms have particularly gained traction in this debate. But many of these proposals fail to take account of what the public really wants in terms of engagement and participation. A more nuanced policy approach, which takes account of the complexity of public views, is required. Utilising the Hansard Society's annual Audit of Political Engagement this article analyses these complexities and suggests that two reforms in particular—enhanced political literacy education and a new House of Commons Petitions (Public Engagement) Committee—would make a difference in developing and sustaining public engagement and participation in the long-term.
机译:在议会支出丑闻之后,已经提出了一系列议会和宪法改革措施,以重新建立公众对议员和议会的信任和信心。旨在通过更直接和参与性决策机制来增强公众参与和参与的民粹主义措施在这场辩论中尤其受到关注。但是,这些建议中有许多都没有考虑到公众在参与和参与方面的真正需求。需要一种考虑到公众意见的复杂性的更加细微的政策方法。本文利用《国会议事录》的年度政治参与审计分析了这些复杂性,并提出两项改革,特别是加强政治素养教育和新的下议院请愿(公众参与)委员会,将在发展和维持公众参与方面有所作为。长期参与。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Parliamentary Affairs》 |2009年第4期|p.673-685|共13页
  • 作者

    Ruth Fox;

  • 作者单位

    DirectorParliament and Government ProgrammeHansard Society;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号