首页> 外文期刊>Oxford Review of Education >Single group, pre- and post-test research designs: Some methodological concerns
【24h】

Single group, pre- and post-test research designs: Some methodological concerns

机译:单一组,测试前和测试后的研究设计:一些方法论上的关注

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article provides two illustrations of some of the factors that can influence findings from pre- and post-test research designs in evaluation studies, including regression to the mean (RTM), maturation, history and test effects. The first illustration involves a re-analysis of data from a study by Marsden (200417. Marsden, E. (2004) Teaching and learning of French verb inflections: a classroom experiment using processing instruction. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southampton. View all references), in which pre-test scores are plotted against gain scores to demonstrate RTM effects. The second illustration is a methodological review of single group, pre- and post-test research designs (pre-experiments) that evaluate causal relationships between intervention and outcome. Re-analysis of Marsden’s prior data shows that learners with higher baseline scores consistently made smaller gains than those with lower baseline scores, demonstrating that RTM is clearly observable in single group, pre-post test designs. Our review found that 13% of the sample of 490 articles were evaluation studies. Of these evaluation studies, about half used an experimental design. However, a quarter used a single group, pre-post test design, and researchers using these designs did not mention possible RTM effects in their explanations, although other explanatory factors were mentioned. We conclude by describing how using experimental or quasi-experimental designs would have enabled researchers to explain their findings more accurately, and to draw more useful implications for pedagogy.View full textDownload full textKeywordseducation research, pre-experiment, regression to the mean, control group, research design, research methodsRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.731208
机译:本文提供了两个可能影响评估研究中测试前和测试后研究设计结果的因素的两个说明,包括均值(RTM)回归,成熟度,历史和测试效果。第一个插图涉及对Marsden(200417. Marsden,E.(2004)的教学,法语动词拐点的教学:使用处理指令的课堂实验)的数据进行的重新分析,南安普敦大学未发表的博士学位论文查看所有参考资料),其中将测试前分数与增益分数作图,以证明RTM效果。第二个插图是对评估干预与结果之间因果关系的单组,测试前和测试后研究设计(实验前)进行的方法学综述。对Marsden先前数据的重新分析表明,基线分数较高的学习者的收益始终比基线分数较低的学习者的收益小,这表明RTM在单组,事后测试设计中清晰可见。我们的审查发现,在490篇文章的样本中,有13%是评估研究。在这些评估研究中,约有一半使用了实验设计。但是,四分之一的人使用一组单独的事后测试设计,尽管提到了其他解释因素,但使用这些设计的研究人员并未在解释中提及可能的RTM效应。最后,我们通过描述使用实验或准实验设计如何使研究人员更准确地解释其发现,并对教学法产生更多有用的含义进行总结。查看全文下载全文关键词教育研究,实验前,回归均值,对照组,研究设计,研究方法相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra- 4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.731208

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号