首页> 外文期刊>Oxford Journal of Legal Studies >Perspectives on Contract Theory from a Mixed Legal System
【24h】

Perspectives on Contract Theory from a Mixed Legal System

机译:混合法系视角下的合同理论视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this article it is argued that Scottish contract theory retains distinctive features which are not shared with the Common Law. The origins of this theory lie in the ‘mixed' nature of its contract law, a mixture established principally through the writings of Stair. That mix is not merely the traditional mix of Roman and Common Law typical of mixed legal systems, but a mix also of natural law ideas with a respect for the rational and free choices of the parties. Respect for free will is seen not just in certain contractual rules such as the absence of a requirement of consideration, but in the existence of a separate obligation of unilateral promise. It is argued that the nature of Scottish contract theory lends itself more easily to defence of the will theory, and that there has been an absence of enthusiasm for the adoption of competing theories of contract in Scotland. It is suggested by way of conclusion that some of the benefits provided by the Scottish structure could be of use to future development of the Common Law, albeit that the Common Law has typically shown itself averse to legal borrowings from its nearest neighbour.
机译:本文认为,苏格兰合同理论保留了与普通法不同的独特特征。该理论的起源在于其合同法的“混合”性质,这种混合主要是通过Stair的著作建立的。这种混合不仅是混合法律体系中典型的罗马法和普通法的传统混合,而且是自然法思想的混合,同时尊重当事方的理性和自由选择。尊重自由意志不仅体现在某些合同规则中,例如没有考虑的要求,而且还存在单方面承诺的单独义务。有人认为,苏格兰合同理论的性质更易于捍卫意志理论,并且苏格兰对采用竞争性合同理论缺乏热情。得出结论,苏格兰结构所提供的一些好处可能对普通法的未来发展有用,尽管普通法通常表明自己不愿向其最近邻国合法借款。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Oxford Journal of Legal Studies》 |2009年第4期|p.643-673|共31页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:06:38

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号