首页> 外文期刊>Organization science >Relational Contracts and Organizational Capabilities
【24h】

Relational Contracts and Organizational Capabilities

机译:关系合同和组织能力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A large literature identifies unique organizational capabilities as a potent source of competitive advantage, yet our knowledge of why capabilities fail to diffuse more rapidly-particularly in situations in which competitors apparently have strong incentives to adopt them and a well-developed understanding of how they work-remains incomplete. In this paper we suggest that competitively significant capabilities often rest on managerial practices that in turn rely on relational contracts (i.e., informal agreements sustained by the shadow of the future). We argue that one of the reasons these practices may be difficult to copy is that effective relational contracts must solve the twin problems of credibility and clarity and that although credibility might, in principle, be instantly acquired, clarity may take time to develop and may interact with credibility in complex ways so that relational contracts may often be difficult to build.
机译:大量文献将独特的组织能力确定为竞争优势的潜在来源,但是我们对能力为何无法迅速扩散的认识(尤其是在竞争者显然强烈地鼓励采用这种能力以及对它们如何运作的充分理解的情况下) -仍然不完整。在本文中,我们建议具有竞争优势的能力通常取决于管理实践,而管理实践又依赖于关系合同(即由未来的阴影维持的非正式协议)。我们认为,这些实践可能难以复制的原因之一是有效的关系合同必须解决信誉和明确性的双重问题,尽管原则上可以立即获得信誉,但清晰性可能需要一段时间才能发展并可能相互作用以复杂的方式获得信誉,因此通常很难建立关系合同。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Organization science》 |2012年第5期|p.1350-1364|共15页
  • 作者单位

    Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142;

    Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts 02163;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    organizational economics; strategy;

    机译:组织经济学;战略;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号