首页> 外文期刊>Organization: The Critical Journal of Organization, Theory and Society >The developments in ethnographic studies of organising: Towards objects of ignorance and objects of concern
【24h】

The developments in ethnographic studies of organising: Towards objects of ignorance and objects of concern

机译:组织的民族教学研究的发展:朝向无知对象和关注物体

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this introduction to the Special Issue, we review the rich tradition of ethnographic studies in organisation studies and critically examine the place of ethnography in organisation studies as practised in schools of business and management. Drawing on the findings of the articles published here, we reflect on the need for a significant extension of the content and syllabus of our discipline to include what we call objects of concern and objects of ignorance. The articles we publish show that decision makers in organizations are not always humans, and nor can we assume the human and its groups monopolise the capacity for agency in organisation. Where we still labour in organisation theory with dualisms such as structure or agent, or subject and object, these articles trace objects and their relations which point to new forms of non-human co-ordination and agency. The organisational realities to which these objects give rise demand careful methodological enquiry, and we show that recent experiments in a genre we call 'post-reflexive ethnography' are likely to prove helpful for developing ethnographic enquiry in contemporary organisation.
机译:在这一特别问题的介绍中,我们审查了组织研究中的民族教学研究的丰富传统,并批判地检查了在商业和管理学校实践的组织研究中的民族志的地位。绘制在此处发表的文章的调查结果,我们反映了我们纪律的内容和教学大纲的需要,以包括我们称之为关注和无知物体的物体。我们发布的文章表明,组织中的决策者并不总是人类,也不能认为人类及其群体占组织中机构的能力。我们仍然仍然具有与结构或代理人,或主题和对象等二元主义的组织理论,这些文章跟踪对象及其与非人类协调和机构的新形式的关系。这些物体引起的组织现实需要仔细方法论调查,我们表明,我们称之为“反身份民族志”的类型中最近的实验可能会有助于在当代组织中开发民族景观。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号