首页> 外文期刊>Organization: The Critical Journal of Organization, Theory and Society >The developments in ethnographic studies of organising: Towards objects of ignorance and objects of concern
【24h】

The developments in ethnographic studies of organising: Towards objects of ignorance and objects of concern

机译:组织的人种学研究的发展:向无知的对象和关注的对象

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In this introduction to the Special Issue, we review the rich tradition of ethnographic studies in organisation studies and critically examine the place of ethnography in organisation studies as practised in schools of business and management. Drawing on the findings of the articles published here, we reflect on the need for a significant extension of the content and syllabus of our discipline to include what we call objects of concern and objects of ignorance. The articles we publish show that decision makers in organizations are not always humans, and nor can we assume the human and its groups monopolise the capacity for agency in organisation. Where we still labour in organisation theory with dualisms such as structure or agent, or subject and object, these articles trace objects and their relations which point to new forms of non-human co-ordination and agency. The organisational realities to which these objects give rise demand careful methodological enquiry, and we show that recent experiments in a genre we call 'post-reflexive ethnography' are likely to prove helpful for developing ethnographic enquiry in contemporary organisation.
机译:在本期特刊的引言中,我们回顾了民族志研究在组织研究中的丰富传统,并严格审查了民族志在组织研究中在商业管理学院实践中的地位。利用此处发表的文章的发现,我们反思了对本学科的内容和课程大纲进行重大扩展的必要性,以包括我们所谓的关注对象和无知对象。我们发表的文章表明,组织中的决策者并不总是人类,我们也不能假设人类及其群体垄断了组织中代理的能力。在我们仍然在组织理论中使用诸如结构或主体,主体或客体之类的二元论的地方,这些文章追踪了客体及其之间的关系,这些关系指向了新的非人类协调和代理形式。这些对象所带来的组织现实要求进行认真的方法论研究,并且我们表明,最近被称为“后反民族志”的这一类型的实验可能被证明有助于发展当代组织中的民族志研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号