首页> 外文期刊>Ocean Development & International Law >The Interpretation of Article 121(3) of UNCLOS by the Tribunal for the South China Sea Arbitration: A Critique
【24h】

The Interpretation of Article 121(3) of UNCLOS by the Tribunal for the South China Sea Arbitration: A Critique

机译:南海仲裁庭对《海洋法公约》第121条第3款的解释:批评

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The interpretation of Article 121(3) of the 1982 U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) was a key part of the Sino-Philippine Arbitration on the South China Sea Award issued in July 2016. This article uses the principles of treaty interpretation codified in Article 31 of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties to evaluate the interpretation process. The Tribunal paid little attention to the text such as "rocks" in the plural form and overlooked the context of Article 121(3). The travaux preparatoires identified by the Tribunal was based on materials of doubtful weight.
机译:1982年《联合国海洋法公约》(UNCLOS)第121(3)条的解释是2016年7月发布的中菲南海仲裁裁决的关键部分。本文使用条约原则解释已编入1969年《维也纳条约法公约》第31条,以评估解释过程。仲裁庭很少注意复数形式的“ rocks”之类的文字,而忽略了第121条第3款的上下文。法庭确定的准备工作准备金的依据是重量可疑的材料。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号