首页> 外文期刊>Neurocomputing >Novel functional brain network methods based on CNN with an application in proficiency evaluation
【24h】

Novel functional brain network methods based on CNN with an application in proficiency evaluation

机译:基于CNN的新型功能性大脑网络方法,其应用熟练评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

With the advancements in the research about the EEG signal processing, there are a large number of different analytical methods include the functional brain network (FBN) methods, most of them are unsupervised and need multi handcrafted steps until classification. It is expected to propose a general-purpose method based on deep learning methods to improve the situation. Therefore, in this paper, we proposed two methods based on the convolutional neural network (CNN). One was analyzing adjacent matrixes computed by the phase locking value (PLV) to generate features based on CNN, which was equivalent to the graph-theoretic (GT) indexes functionally. The other method was a novel end-to-end method, brain connection based on CNN (BCCNN), which used a factorized 1-D CNN to filter the temporal part of the raw EEG, computed the correlation coefficients among the electrodes to build a new kind of FBNs and then extracted features from the FBNs like the last method. Then we performed a working memory (WM) experiment to verify the validity of the two methods. Those methods were used to detect the proficiency of the subjects in a WM task. In the results, the accuracy of the first method was 99.33%, which was as good as that of the GT indexes (99.35%). The accuracy of the second methods was 96.53%, which was lower than the performance of the PLV but higher than that of two conventional CNNs (94.37%, 90.83%). (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:随着关于EEG信号处理的研究的进步,存在大量不同的分析方法包括功能性脑网络(FBN)方法,其中大多数是无监督的,需要多手动步骤直到分类。预计将提出一种基于深度学习方法的通用方法来改善情况。因此,在本文中,我们提出了一种基于卷积神经网络(CNN)的两种方法。一个人正在分析由锁相值(PLV)计算的相邻矩阵,以基于CNN生成特征,其等同于功能上的图形定理(GT)索引。另一种方法是一种新的端到端方法,基于CNN(BCCNN)的脑连接,其使用分解的1-D CNN来过滤RAW EEG的时间部分,从而计算了电极之间的相关系数以构建a新类型的FBN,然后从FBN中提取特征,如最后方法。然后我们执行了一个工作内存(WM)实验,以验证两种方法的有效性。这些方法用于检测WM任务中受试者的熟练程度。在结果中,第一种方法的准确性为99.33%,与GT指数(99.35%)一样好。第二种方法的准确性为96.53%,低于PLV的性能,但高于两种常规CNN的性能(94.37%,90.83%)。 (c)2019 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号