The essay rejects the idea that 'collective identity' and 'cultural identity' are necessarily the same. Its aim is to preserve the usefulness of the former notion, by introducing 'the integrative circle of collective identity' as a terminological toolbox. This diagrammatic formula may help us find a common terminological language with which to handle the multitude of concrete variations on the theme of the collective in literary works. The second half of the paper demonstrates the theory in E. L. Doctorow's World's Fair and Leslie Marmon Silko's Ceremony by focusing on their representation of ceremony and ritual. Although the textual analysis cannot take up all the implications of the model, it hopes to propose a new and fruitful form of analysis. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.
展开▼
机译:这篇文章拒绝了“集体身份”和“文化身份”必然相同的观点。其目的是通过引入“集体身份的整合圈”作为术语工具箱来保留前一个概念的有用性。这种图解式的公式可以帮助我们找到一种通用的术语语言,用以处理文学作品中集体主题的多种具体变化。本文的下半部分着重于仪式和仪式的表现,从而在E. L. Doctorow的世界博览会和Leslie Marmon Silko的仪式上演示了该理论。尽管文本分析不能完全涵盖该模型的所有含义,但它希望提出一种新颖而富有成果的分析形式。该修订版于2006年6月在线发布,并更正了涵盖日期。
展开▼