首页> 外文期刊>NDT & E international >Elastic Net Regularization in Lorentz force evaluation
【24h】

Elastic Net Regularization in Lorentz force evaluation

机译:洛伦兹力评估中的弹性网正则化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Lorentz force evaluation is a nondestructive evaluation method applied for the characterization of sub-surface defects in specimen consisting of layers of conducting material. The movement of a specimen under investigation relative to a permanent magnet leads to Lorentz forces that are perturbed in the presence of a defect. A minimum norm estimation (MNE) with Elastic Net Regularization (ENR) is compared to MNE with Tikhonov-Phillips-Regularization (TPR) regarding the ability to determine defect properties from force perturbation signals. A cylindrically shaped defect with diameter of 5 mm and height of 2 mm is examined at depths of 2, 4 and 8 mm. Simulated data obtained by the finite element method and measured data are considered. ENR and TPR estimated the defect depth correctly for simulation and measurement data at depths of 2 and 4 mm, while at 8 mm, only ENR estimated the depth correctly. The defect sizes were slightly overestimated for both ENR and TPR. TPR produced additional spurious solutions at the boundary of the reconstruction grid. We conclude that ENR is more suitable than TPR for MNE in Lorentz force evaluation.
机译:洛伦兹力评估是一种无损评估方法,用于表征由导电材料层组成的样品中的亚表面缺陷。被检样品相对于永磁体的运动会导致洛伦兹力,该力在存在缺陷时会受到干扰。关于从力扰动信号确定缺陷性质的能力,将具有弹性净正则化(ENR)的最小范数估计(MNE)与具有Tikhonov-Phillips正则化(TPR)的MNE进行比较。在2、4和8mm的深度处检查了直径为5mm且高度为2mm的圆柱形缺陷。考虑通过有限元方法获得的模拟数据和测量数据。对于2毫米和4毫米的深度,ENR和TPR可以正确估计缺陷深度,以用于仿真和测量数据,而在8毫米时,只有ENR可以正确估计深度。 ENR和TPR的缺陷尺寸都被高估了一点。 TPR在重建网格的边界处产生了其他虚假解。我们得出结论,在洛伦兹力评估中,ENR比TPR更适合用于MNE。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号