...
首页> 外文期刊>Natural Resources Journal >Comments on Land Trusts and the Choice to Conserve Land with Full Ownership or Conservation Easements
【24h】

Comments on Land Trusts and the Choice to Conserve Land with Full Ownership or Conservation Easements

机译:关于土地信托和拥有全部所有权或保护地役权的土地选择的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Nick Parker's examination of land trust decision making is of great interest to environmentalists, social scientists, and policy makers. His article is of particular interest to those who seek a better understanding of how private property rights affect and are affected by the growing land trust phenomenon. But rather than focus on their phenomenal growth and why there are land trusts, Parker seeks to get inside the box of the land trust, the not-for-profit firm itself, and explain the logic of choice that is applied when those organizations have the opportunity to receive ownership of particular land rights. Will the trust decide to hold conservation easements for the rights in question or will the trust seek the full bundle of land rights-fee simple? This is the motivating question for the article.
机译:环保人士,社会科学家和政策制定者对尼克·帕克(Nick Parker)对土地信托决策的研究感到非常感兴趣。那些希望更好地了解私有财产权如何影响和受到日益增长的土地信任现象影响的人特别感兴趣。但是,帕克(Parker)不在关注其惊人的增长以及为什么会有土地信托,而是寻求进入土地信托的框框,即非营利性公司本身,并解释那些组织拥有土地信托时所采用的选择逻辑。获得特定土地所有权的机会。信托会决定对有关权利进行保护地役权,还是会寻求简单的全部土地权费用?这是本文的激励问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号