首页> 外文期刊>IEEE transactions on mobile computing >Performance evaluation of pipeline paging under paging delay constraint for wireless systems
【24h】

Performance evaluation of pipeline paging under paging delay constraint for wireless systems

机译:无线系统在寻呼延迟约束下的管道寻呼性能评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper, we present a simple pipeline paging (PP) scheme, in which multiple paging requests (PRs) can be served in a pipeline manner in different paging areas. We analytically model the blanket paging (BP) scheme, the sequential paging (SP) scheme, and the PIP scheme so that discovery rate, total delay, paging delay, and cost are derived analytically as functions of traffic load. Extensive simulations are carried out to verity our analytical results. Our study shows that the PIP scheme outperforms both the BIP and SIP schemes in terms of discover rate while maintaining the same cost as the SIP scheme. The PIP scheme outperforms the SP scheme in terms of total delay and has a lower total delay than the BIP scheme when traffic load is high. We also show that, when the paging delay constraint D is large enough, the PIP scheme achieves almost 200 percent of discovery rate and 50 percent of cost of the BP scheme, whereas discovery rate of the SIP scheme is far less than that of the BP scheme. Furthermore, we solve the following two-optimization problems for the PIP scheme: 1) the minimization of discovery rate with a bound on total delay and 2) the minimization of cost with a bound on total delay. In case the cost factor is not considered but total delay is important, we propose an adaptive scheme: When the traffic is lower than a threshold, the BIP scheme is adopted; otherwise, the PIP scheme is used. In this case, the threshold value is explicitly derived.
机译:在本文中,我们提出了一种简单的流水线寻呼(PP)方案,其中可以以流水线的方式在不同的寻呼区域中服务多个寻呼请求(PR)。我们对毯式分页(BP)方案,顺序分页(SP)方案和PIP方案进行分析建模,以便发现速率,总延迟,分页延迟和成本是流量负载的函数。进行了广泛的仿真以验证我们的分析结果。我们的研究表明,在发现率方面,PIP方案优于BIP和SIP方案,同时保持与SIP方案相同的成本。当流量负载较高时,PIP方案在总延迟方面胜过SP方案,并且总延迟低于BIP方案。我们还表明,当寻呼延迟约束D足够大时,PIP方案的发现率几乎达到BP方案的200%,成本达到BP方案的50%,而SIP方案的发现率却远小于BP的发现率方案。此外,我们为PIP方案解决了以下两个优化问题:1)限制总延迟的发现率最小化; 2)限制总延迟的成本最小化。在不考虑成本因素但总延迟很重要的情况下,我们提出一种自适应方案:当流量低于阈值时,采用BIP方案;否则,使用PIP方案。在这种情况下,明确推导出阈值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号