首页> 外文期刊>The MJ >Don't just cut jobs - engage
【24h】

Don't just cut jobs - engage

机译:不只是裁员-参与

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Just how the Government is choosing to approach the concept of the Big Society matters greatly to councils as employers because it structures the response to coming budget cuts. Some councils will be spreading cuts widely to protect all services as much as possible. Compulsory redundancies will be kept to a minimum. On the other hand, if local politicians take the view that they should build the Big Society locally, they are likely to withdraw from many activities and pass what money and responsibility they can to local groups. In these circumstances there is the potential for significant redundancy programmes, not just to match cuts but to reflect the fact that from now on, the council will tend to employ a small number of people to facilitate community devolution.
机译:政府如何选择采用“大社会”的概念,对于作为雇主的理事会来说,意义重大,因为它可以对即将来临的预算削减做出反应。一些议会将广泛削减开支,以尽可能保护所有服务。强制性裁员将保持在最低水平。另一方面,如果当地政客认为他们应该在当地建立大社会,那么他们很可能会退出许多活动,而将自己可以承担的金钱和责任转移给当地团体。在这种情况下,可能会有大量的裁员计划,不仅是为了削减开支,而且是为了反映这样一个事实,即从现在开始,理事会将倾向于雇用少量人员来促进社区权力下放。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The MJ》 |2010年第14期|p.3|共1页
  • 作者

    Jan Parkinson;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号