...
首页> 外文期刊>MIT Sloan Management Review >How Strategic Is Your Board?
【24h】

How Strategic Is Your Board?

机译:您的董事会战略性如何?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In a world where business models are evolving rapidly and new competitors can emerge almost overnight, strategic thinking - especially at the top of the company - is more important than ever to a company's survival. However, the authors argue, boards of directors have no clear model to follow when it comes to developing the strategic role that is best suited to the company they oversee. As with other leadership roles, the one played by the board varies with the company's culture and the norms and legal requirements of its home country, as well as the norms of the industry. More importantly, the board must play a role that matches the strategic needs of the company and the state of its sector. The board of a young company, for example, usually needs to wrestle with different strategic issues than the board of a long-established company. In the authors' view, three dimensions shape the board's contributions to strategy: 1. A Definition of Strategy Companies define strategy in different ways, depending on their place in their industry and the nature of their industry. Often boards go wrong simply because they have not defined the right measures of competition or the right challenges on which to focus. 2. The Role of the Board The board's role in strategy may range from that of advisers who supervise the strategy to full coauthors of the company's game plan. 3. The Context of the Company The board's involvement in strategy also depends on the context or environment in which the company competes. If the company operates in a market that has a fairly simple and stable competitive dynamic, the board may be well advised to remain distant and largely hands-off on strategy questions. In a more chaotic context, however, a board may choose to take a stronger, hands-on approach to strategy development. These three variables, and the interaction among them, make determining a board's responsibilities for strategy a complex decision. However, the authors suggest, analyzing the three variables in detail can help clarify how a given board can best contribute to a company's strategy.
机译:在当今商业模式迅速发展,新竞争对手几乎在一夜之间崛起的世界中,战略思考(尤其是公司的高层管理人员)对公司的生存比以往任何时候都更为重要。但是,作者们认为,在制定最适合他们所监管的公司的战略角色时,董事会没有明确的模式可循。与其他领导角色一样,董事会所扮演的角色随公司的文化,所在国家的规范和法律要求以及行业规范而变化。更重要的是,董事会必须发挥与公司战略需求及其行业状况相匹配的作用。例如,一个年轻的公司的董事会通常需要与一个历史悠久的公司的董事会争夺不同的战略问题。在作者看来,三个方面决定着董事会对战略的贡献:1.战略的定义公司根据其在行业中的地位和行业性质以不同的方式定义战略。董事会常常会犯错,只是因为它们没有定义正确的竞争措施或应关注的正确挑战。 2.董事会的角色董事会在战略中的角色可能从监督战略的顾问到公司游戏计划的正式合著者不等。 3.公司的环境董事会对战略的参与还取决于公司竞争的环境或环境。如果公司在一个竞争条件相对简单且稳定的市场中运营,则最好建议董事会保持疏远,并在很大程度上解决战略问题。但是,在更加混乱的情况下,董事会可能会选择采用更强大的动手方法来制定战略。这三个变量,以及它们之间的相互作用,使得确定董事会的战略职责成为一项复杂的决定。但是,作者建议,详细分析这三个变量可以帮助阐明给定的董事会如何才能最好地为公司的战略做出贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号