...
首页> 外文期刊>Minerva >University vs. Research Institute? The Dual Pillars of German Science Production, 1950-2010
【24h】

University vs. Research Institute? The Dual Pillars of German Science Production, 1950-2010

机译:大学vs.研究所?德国科学生产的双支柱,1950-2010

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The world's third largest producer of scientific research, Germany, is the origin of the research university and the independent, extra-university research institute. Its dual-pillar research policy differentiates these organizational forms functionally: universities specialize in advanced research-based teaching; institutes specialize intensely on research. Over the past decades this policy affected each sector differently: while universities suffered a lingering "legitimation crisis," institutes enjoyed deepening "favored sponsorship"-financial and reputational advantages. Universities led the nation's reestablishment of scientific prominence among the highly competitive European and global science systems after WWII. But sectoral analysis of contributions to science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medical and health journal publications (1950-2010) finds that Germany's small to medium-sized independent research institutes have made significant, growing contributions, particularly in publishing in higher impact journals proportionally more than their size. Simultaneously-despite dual-pillar policy implications-the university sector continues to be absolutely and relatively successful; not eclipsed by the institutes. Universities have consistently produced two-thirds of the nation's publications in the highest quality journals since at least 1980 and have increased publications at a logarithmic rate; higher than the international mean. Indeed, they led Germany into the global mega-science style of production. Contrary to assumed benefits of functional differentiation, our results indicate that relative to their size, each sector has produced approximately similar publication records. While institutes have succeeded, the larger university sector, despite much less funding growth, has remained fundamental to German science production. Considering these findings, we discuss the future utility of the dual-pillar policy.
机译:全球第三大科研制片人德国,是研究大学的起源和独立的大学研究所。其双支柱研究政策在功能上区分了这些组织形式:大学专注于基于先进的研究教学;研究所专注于研究。在过去的几十年中,这项政策不同地影响了每个部门:虽然大学遭受了挥之不去的“合法危机”,但享有深化的“青睐赞助” - 金融和声誉的优势。大学在二战之后领导了全国在高竞争激烈的欧洲和全球科学系统中重建科学突出。但对科学,技术,工程,数学和医疗和医疗杂志(1950-2010)的贡献的部门分析发现,德国对中型的中小型独立研究机构进行了重大,不断增长的贡献,特别是在发布更高的影响期刊方面比例地比其大小更多。同时 - 尽管双支柱政策影响 - 大学部门仍然是绝对相对成功的;没有由机构黯然失色。自从至少1980年以来,大学在最高质量的期刊中一直在最高质量的期刊中生产了三分之二的出版物,并以对数率增加了出版物;高于国际意思。事实上,他们带领德国进入全球巨型科学的生产风格。与假设功能分化的益处相反,我们的结果表明,相对于其规模,每个部门都产生了大约类似的出版物记录。虽然机构已经成功,但较大的大学部门尽管资金增长不那么少,但对德国科学的生产仍然是基础。考虑到这些调查结果,我们讨论了双支柱政策的未来效用。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Minerva》 |2020年第3期|319-342|共24页
  • 作者单位

    Institute of Education and Society University of Luxembourg 11 Porte des Sciences 4366 Esch-sur-Alzette Luxembourg;

    Institute of Education and Society University of Luxembourg 11 Porte des Sciences 4366 Esch-sur-Alzette Luxembourg;

    Department of Education Policy Studies The Pennsylvania State University University Park PA 16802 USA;

    Graduate Institute of Technical and Vocational Education National Taipei University of Technology 1 Sec. 3 Zhongxiao E. Rd. Taipei 10608 Taiwan R.O.C.;

    Department of Education Policy Studies The Pennsylvania State University University Park PA 16802 USA;

    Institute of Sociology Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg Emil-Abderhalden-Str. 26-27 06099 Halle/Saale Germany;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Germany; University; Research institute; Research policy; Science production; STEM+;

    机译:德国;大学;研究机构;研究政策;科学生产;茎+;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号