【24h】

Engineers Face Ethical Dilemmas

机译:工程师面临道德困境

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I am pleased to become a regular contributor of engineering ethics topics to the readers of Leadership and Management in Engineering. I first formally encountered engineering ethics topics about 25 years ago, when I was an undergraduate civil engineering student at the Missouri University of Science & Technology (S&T; formerly University of Missouri—Rolla). Dr. Paul Munger taught a course on engineering ethics that I found life changing (although I didn't realize it fully at the time). The Hyatt Regency disaster in Kansas City had recently happened (Wikipedia 2012), and Dr. Munger was involved with investigating what role the engineers had in causing the disaster. Remember the situation? On July 17, 1981, there was a big tea dance party, and the hotel had a very elaborate skywalk that hundreds of people stood on to observe the party. The skywalk collapsed because the connections had been improperly designed. Communications between the engineers and the steel manufacturing vendor had also been poor; the steel manufacturer thought some design drawings were final when in fact they were preliminary. Also, the design engineers did not thoroughly check requested changes by the steel manufacturer before the changes were approved and constructed. There were more than 100 fatalities, and more than 200 additional people were injured (Wikipedia 2012).
机译:我很高兴能向工程学领导力和管理学的读者定期提交工程伦理学专题文章。大约25年前,当我在密苏里科技大学(S&T;前身为密苏里州罗拉大学)的土木工程专业本科时,我第一次正式遇到了工程伦理学主题。保罗·芒格(Paul Munger)博士教授了一门工程伦理学课程,我发现生活在改变(尽管当时我还没有完全意识到这一点)。堪萨斯城的凯悦酒店灾难最近发生过(维基百科,2012年),芒格博士参与调查工程师在造成灾难中的作用。还记得情况吗? 1981年7月17日,有一个大型的茶舞会,而酒店的步道非常精致,数百人站起来观看派对。由于连接的设计不当,导致天桥坍塌。工程师和钢铁制造商之间的交流也很差。钢铁制造商认为某些设计图是最终的,而实际上是初步的。同样,设计工程师没有在批准和建造变更之前彻底检查钢铁制造商要求的变更。死亡人数超过100,另有200多人受伤(维基百科,2012年)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号