首页> 外文学位 >Ethical thinkers for the twenty-first century: A descriptive study of ethical reasoning frameworks elementary principals use when faced with an ethical dilemma at work.
【24h】

Ethical thinkers for the twenty-first century: A descriptive study of ethical reasoning frameworks elementary principals use when faced with an ethical dilemma at work.

机译:二十一世纪的伦理思想家:对基本原理在工作中面临道德困境时使用的伦理推理框架的描述性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose. The study had two purposes. The first was to determine to what degree selected elementary principals, when faced with an ethical dilemma at work, use and find helpful the components of a framework for ethical reasoning which includes the ethic of justice, care, critique, and profession. The second was to determine to what degree they rely on other sources to help them make fair and right decisions for all involved.;Methodology. Twenty elementary principals from ten districts in Southern California comprised the study sample. This descriptive study used both a survey and face-to-face interview guide developed by the researcher. The response rate for both instruments was 100 percent. The data generated from the surveys and interviews were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative methods.;Findings. Elementary principals who participated in the study use the ethics of justice, care, critique, and profession as lenses to focus on what is in the best interests of their students and staff when they make decisions. Principals did not always refer to the ethics by name, but demonstrated their understanding and use of each ethic during interviews.;Conclusions. The three conclusions based on the findings in this study were that elementary principals who use an ethical reasoning framework which includes the ethics of justice, care, critique, and profession: (1) make decisions that are fair and right for all involved; (2) present a solid rationale for their decisions when challenged by internal and external stakeholders; (3) rely on a variety of other resources as well for guidance and advice including principal colleagues, district office administrators, their superintendent, laws, and policies to help them formulate ethical decisions.;Recommendations for future research. Replicate this study with a larger sample of elementary principals from districts in Northern and Southern California to determine if the findings and conclusions are the same as those of this study.;Implications for action. Provide opportunities for educational leaders to learn about the importance and application of ethical reasoning frameworks at work.
机译:目的。该研究有两个目的。首先是确定在面对工作中的道德困境时选择基本校长的程度,使用并发现有益的道德推理框架的组成部分,其中包括正义,谨慎,批判和职业道德。第二是确定他们在多大程度上依靠其他资源来帮助他们为所有相关人员做出公平,正确的决定。来自南加州十个区的二十位小学校长组成了研究样本。这项描述性研究同时使用了调查人员和研究人员开发的面对面访谈指南。两种仪器的响应率为100%。使用描述性统计数据和定性方法分析了从调查和访谈中获得的数据。参与研究的基本校长以正义,关怀,批判和职业道德为镜片,着眼于学生和员工在做出决策时的最大利益。校长并不总是通过名字提及道德规范,而是在面试时展示他们对每种道德规范的理解和运用。根据本研究结果得出的三个结论是,基本校长使用的是道德推理框架,其中包括正义,关怀,批判和职业道德:(1)对所有相关人员做出公平,正确的决定; (2)当受到内部和外部利益相关者的挑战时,为其决策提供坚实的理由; (3)还要依靠各种其他资源来提供指导和建议,包括主要同事,地区办公室管理人员,其主管,法律和政策,以帮助他们制定道德决策。用北加州和南加州各地区的更多基本负责人样本来复制本研究,以确定发现和结论是否与本研究相同。行动的意义。为教育领导者提供机会,以了解工作中的道德推理框架的重要性和应用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Terrazas-Wells, Lydia.;

  • 作者单位

    University of La Verne.;

  • 授予单位 University of La Verne.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.;Education Administration.;Education Elementary.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 260 p.
  • 总页数 260
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 动物医学(兽医学);
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:42:18

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号