首页> 外文期刊>Lasers in Medical Science >Comparative evaluation of the effects of Nd:YAG and Er:YAG laser in dentin hypersensitivity treatment
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of the effects of Nd:YAG and Er:YAG laser in dentin hypersensitivity treatment

机译:Nd:YAG和Er:YAG激光在牙本质过敏治疗中效果的比较评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) is one of the most common complications that affect patients after periodontal therapy. So far, many investigators have successfully used different types of laser on DH treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparative effect of Nd:YAG laser and Er:YAG laser on human teeth desensitization. A group of nine patients with a total of 63 chronic hypersensitive teeth were selected. Each one of them should at least have three hypersensitive teeth. These teeth were randomly allocated into three groups. Group 1, Nd:YAG laser (1 W, 15 Hz, 60 s, two times); group 2, Er:YAG laser (100 mJ, 3 Hz, 60 s, two times); and group 3 serves as control group without any treatment. Assessment of pain was performed by a visual analysing scale (VAS) after stimulation of sensitive tooth by using the sharp tip of an explorer. This test was performed before treatment, immediately after that and at 1-, 3- and 6-month intervals after treatment by one blinded examiner. Analysis of VAS score between the three groups at the time of treatment did not show any significant difference (p = 0.506). However, by using repeated-measurement analysis of variance test, significant differences were seen in the three groups between before-treatment VAS score and after treatment (p < 0.0005). This statistically significant difference in the control group demonstrated a placebo effect. However, the effect of using Nd:YAG and Er:YAG lasers was stronger than this placebo effect, so that after removing the effect of the placebo, differences immediately after, 1, 3 and 6 months post treatment between all three groups still were statistically highly significant (p < 0.0005). Compared to the Er:YAG laser group, using Nd:YAG laser resulted in a significant reduction of VAS score at each follow-up examination (p < 0.0005). Although using Nd:YAG and Er:YAG laser in desensitization of hypersensitive teeth showed a placebo effect limited to a short time, results of this study demonstrated that both of these lasers have an acceptable therapeutic effect. The observed effects seemed to last for at least 6 months. It was concluded that Nd:YAG laser is more effective than Er:YAG laser in reduction of patients’ pain.
机译:牙本质过敏症(DH)是牙周治疗后影响患者的最常见并发症之一。迄今为止,许多研究人员已成功地将不同类型的激光用于DH治疗。这项研究的目的是评估Nd:YAG激光和Er:YAG激光对人牙齿脱敏的比较效果。选择了9例患者,共63颗慢性过敏性牙齿。他们每个人至少应有三颗过敏性牙齿。这些牙齿被随机分为三组。第1组Nd:YAG激光(1 W,15 Hz,60 s,两次);第2组,Er:YAG激光(100 mJ,3 Hz,60 s,两次);第3组为对照组,不做任何治疗。在使用灵敏的探尖刺激敏感牙齿后,通过视觉分析量表(VAS)进行疼痛评估。该测试是在治疗之前,治疗之后,以及治疗后的1个月,3个月和6个月的间隔内由一名盲人的检查员进行的。在治疗时三组之间的VAS评分分析未显示任何显着差异(p = 0.506)。但是,通过使用方差检验的重复测量分析,三组在治疗前和治疗后的VAS评分之间存在显着差异(p <0.0005)。对照组的这一统计学显着性差异显示出安慰剂作用。但是,使用Nd:YAG和Er:YAG激光的效果要强于这种安慰剂效果,因此,除去安慰剂的效果后,三组治疗后,治疗后1、3和6个月之间的差异仍在统计学上高度显着(p <0.0005)。与Er:YAG激光组相比,在每次随访检查中使用Nd:YAG激光可显着降低VAS评分(p <0.0005)。尽管在过敏性牙齿脱敏中使用Nd:YAG和Er:YAG激光显示了有限的安慰剂作用,但这项研究的结果表明这两种激光都具有可接受的治疗效果。观察到的效果似乎持续了至少6个月。结论是,Nd:YAG激光在减轻患者痛苦方面比Er:YAG激光更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号