首页> 外文期刊>Journal of world trade >One Step Forward and Two Steps Back? Evolution of Bilateral Safeguard Provisions in Preferential Trade Agreements
【24h】

One Step Forward and Two Steps Back? Evolution of Bilateral Safeguard Provisions in Preferential Trade Agreements

机译:一步向前迈出两步? 在优惠贸易协定中双边保障条款的演变

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There is an emergence of including bilateral safeguard provisions in Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs). Most PTAs embed bilateral safeguard provisions to buffer the risk of import surges caused by tariff reductions in the infra-PTA trade. These provisions can be applied only between the PTA members, and they mainly have legal effect during the transitional period of forming a customs union or a free trade area. These provisions are linguistically similar to the multilateral safeguard codes (MSCs), i.e., Article XIX General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the Agreement on Safeguards (SA), some of them even directly incorporate or copy some of the language from MSCs. This article observes that these bilateral safeguard provisions reveal 'evolving' features and can be mapped into three generations. Aside from the great similarity as compared to the MSCs, in the Laissez-faire of PTAs, bilateral safeguard provisions deviate from the WTO rulings: on the one hand, they are more trade-friendly since they primarily limit the form of safeguard measures to tariffs, and the duration is significantly shorter; on the other hand, they deviate from the important value of WTO since the special and differential treatment for the developing countries are hardly addressed in the North-South PTAs, the same applies to the prohibition of 'grey area' measure.
机译:出现在优惠贸易协定(PTA)中包括双边保障条款。大多数PTA都嵌入了双边保障条款,以缓冲通过关税减少的进口浪涌风险的贸易。这些规定只能在PTA成员之间申请,他们主要在形成习俗联合会或自由贸易区的过渡期间具有法律效力。这些规定是与多边保障代码(MSC)的语言学相似,即XIX综合关税和贸易(GATT)和保障协定(SA)的协议,其中一些甚至直接纳入或复制来自MSC的一些语言。本文介绍,这些双边保障条款揭示了“不断发展”的功能,可以映射到三代。除了与MSC相比的卓越相似之处,在PTA的Laissez-Faire中,双边保障条款偏离WTO裁决:一方面,它们更加贸易友好,因为它们主要限制了保护措施的关税的保障措施的形式,持续时间明显缩短;另一方面,由于发展中国家的特殊和差异治疗在南北PTA中几乎没有解决,因此他们偏离了世贸组织的重要价值,同样适用于禁止“灰色区域”措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号