首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Vocational Education & Training >Learning in the school workplace: knowledge acquisition and modelling in preparatory vocational secondary education
【24h】

Learning in the school workplace: knowledge acquisition and modelling in preparatory vocational secondary education

机译:在学校工作场所学习:职业中等教育的知识获取和建模

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper addresses the composite question of whether it is better in vocational education to allow students to design their own models and guide them while doing so, or to provide them with ready‐made models. To answer this question we set up a design experiment in which students were asked to work on real‐life assignments, guided by teachers in the process of designing their products while learning the necessary concepts and skills as they went along. The use of models was required during the design stage. The students were asked to design and build a tandem tricycle during a 10‐week period. The experimental sample comprised two schools and 65 students, aged 15 years. A pre‐test‐post‐test control group design was used to determine the results. The two conditions differed in the way models were taught: in the experimental condition the models were co‐operatively designed by the students under teacher guidance; in the control condition, ready‐made models were provided. It was hypothesised that the students in the experimental condition would outperform their counterparts in the control condition on knowledge and modelling. However, it was found that both groups scored equally well on the post‐knowledge test in science and mathematics, while the experimental group gained more on modelling. Implications for teacher guidance and school climate are discussed.View full textDownload full textKeywordsvocational education, modelling, providing versus guided co‐constructionRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2010.484629
机译:本文讨论了一个综合性的问题,即允许学生设计自己的模型并在指导过程中指导他们,还是为他们提供现成的模型,是更好的职业教育方法。为了回答这个问题,我们建立了一个设计实验,要求学生在老师指导下设计产品的过程中进行实际的生活任务,同时学习必要的概念和技能。在设计阶段需要使用模型。要求学生在10周的时间内设计并制造一辆双人三轮车。实验样本包括两所学校和65名学生,年龄15岁。测试前,测试后测试对照组的设计用于确定结果。这两个条件在模型的教学方式上有所不同:在实验条件下,模型是由学生在老师的指导下合作设计的;在控制条件下,提供了现成的模型。假设在知识和建模方面,处于实验条件下的学生在控制条件下的表现将优于同等条件下的学生。但是,发现在科学和数学的后知识测验中,两组的得分均相当好,而实验组在建模方面获得了更高的分数。讨论了对教师指导和学校氛围的影响。查看全文下载全文关键字职业教育,建模,提供与指导合作的构建Delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2010.484629

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号