首页> 外文期刊>Journal of testing and evaluation >A Comparative Finite-Element Study of Hot Rolling and Plane Strain Compression Testing of Aluminum AA1050
【24h】

A Comparative Finite-Element Study of Hot Rolling and Plane Strain Compression Testing of Aluminum AA1050

机译:铝热轧和平面应变压缩试验的有限元比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A comprehensive study on the comparison of hot rolling and plane strain compression testing (PSC) using the finite-element method (FEM) is reported in the present paper. The key physical variables during hot rolling and PSC testing of aluminum AA1050 are quantified and compared. The results show that the process variables, i.e., local stress, strain, strain rate, and temperature, vary from entry to exit and throughout the thickness of the work piece during hot rolling, while the evolution pattern of these parameters during PSC testing under a constant nominal strain rate is quite uniform. Therefore, for a given amount of nominal deformation (reduction), the loading history and the spatial distributions of these process variables are quite different in both cases. It is indicated that a further examination of the deformation history should be made when applying the relationships established from PSC testing to real industrial hot rolling operations.
机译:本文报道了使用有限元方法(FEM)对热轧和平面应变压缩试验(PSC)进行比较的综合研究。量化并比较了铝A1050在热轧和PSC测试过程中的关键物理变量。结果表明,在热轧过程中,过程变量(即局部应力,应变,应变率和温度)从入口到出口以及整个工件厚度都会变化,而在PSC测试条件下,这些参数的演变方式是恒定的名义应变率是相当均匀的。因此,对于给定的名义变形量(减小),这两种过程变量的加载历史和空间分布在两种情况下都完全不同。结果表明,当将由PSC测试建立的关系应用于实际的工业热轧操作时,应进一步检查变形历史。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号