...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public economics >Punishment and counter-punishment in public good games: Can we really govern ourselves?
【24h】

Punishment and counter-punishment in public good games: Can we really govern ourselves?

机译:公益游戏中的惩罚与反惩罚:我们真的可以自已治理吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A number of experimental studies have shown that the opportunity to punish anti-social behavior increases cooperation levels when agents face a social dilemma. Using a public good experiment, I show that in the presence of counter-punishment opportunities cooperators are less willing to punish free riders. As a result, cooperation breaks down and groups have lower earnings in comparison to a treatment without punishments where free riding is predominant. Approximately one quarter of all punishments are retaliated. Counter-punishments appear to be driven partly by strategic considerations and partly by a desire to reciprocate punishments.
机译:许多实验研究表明,当特工面临社会困境时,惩罚反社会行为的机会会提高合作水平。通过公共公益实验,我表明,在存在反惩罚机会的情况下,合作者不太愿意惩罚搭便车的人。结果,与以自由骑行为主的无惩罚治疗相比,合作破裂了,团体的收入较低。所有处罚中约有四分之一受到报复。反惩罚似乎部分是出于战略考虑,部分是出于对惩罚的渴望。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号