首页> 外文OA文献 >Punishment and Counter-punishment in Public Goods Games: Can we still govern ourselves?
【2h】

Punishment and Counter-punishment in Public Goods Games: Can we still govern ourselves?

机译:公共物品游戏中的惩罚与反惩罚:我们还能控制自己吗?

摘要

Recent public goods experiments have shown that free riding can be curtailed through mutual monitoring and sanctioning between members of a group. However, often we can not allow for punishment and exclude the possibility of counter-punishment occurring. We design a public goods experiment, where we allow for both punishment and counter-punishment. We find that in both partner and stranger treatments cooperation declines over time. The reason is that people are less willing to punish under the threat of counter-punishment. Participants squander their endowment in costly confrontations leading to a relative payoff loss, in comparison to a treatment without punishments.
机译:最近的公共产品实验表明,可以通过团体成员之间的相互监视和制裁来减少搭便车。但是,通常我们不能允许惩罚,也不能排除发生反惩罚的可能性。我们设计了一个公共物品实验,在该实验中我们允许惩罚和反惩罚。我们发现在伴侣和陌生人治疗中,合作都会随着时间的推移而下降。原因是人们不愿意在反惩罚的威胁下进行惩罚。与没有惩罚的治疗相比,参与者将自己的捐赠浪费在昂贵的对抗上,导致相对的回报损失。

著录项

  • 作者

    Nikiforakis Nikos;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2004
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号