...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Product & Brand Management >Strategic and institutional sustainability: corporate social responsibility, brand value, and Interbrand listing
【24h】

Strategic and institutional sustainability: corporate social responsibility, brand value, and Interbrand listing

机译:战略和机构可持续发展:企业社会责任,品牌价值和品牌间上市

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the impact of strategic and institutional (normative) corporate social responsibility (CSR) on brand value and brand reputation, based on the strategic and legitimacy theory of CSR. It argues that because CSR strengths represent firms’ proactive approach to satisfy their stakeholders’ interests, the authors expect that this proactive approach is likely to generate an accumulated level of reservoir of goodwill that is positively related to the level of brand value. In contrast, the authors would expect that social irresponsibility (CSR concerns), as a measure of firms’ reactive position to stakeholders’ interests, adversely affects the incremental change in this reservoir of goodwill. Design/methodology/approach: This paper measures strategic CSR using CSR strengths and normative (institutional) CSR from CSR concerns scores from the MSCI ESG (Kinder Lydenburg Domini). This paper measures the level of brand value from the Interbrand listing, and it measures the brand reputation based on changes in brand value and brand ranking from Interbrand’s 100 global brands. Findings: This paper finds evidence to support the authors’ theory that one-, two- and three-year lagged CSR strengths positively affect the level of brand value. This study also finds empirical evidence to support the authors’ hypothesis that CSR concerns adversely affect changes in brand value and brand ranking. This study concludes that the differing impacts of CSR strengths and CSR concerns help the authors better understand the impacts of firms’ pro-action and reaction to stakeholders’ interests ion brand values and ranking. Practical implications: The findings indicate that strategic CSR enhances brand value, while socially irresponsible activities that are against social norms, values and ethics adversely affect the companies’ legitimacy and adversely affect changes in brand reputation. Originality/value: This research offers a new perspective to distinguish the differing impacts of CSR strengths and concerns on brand value and brand reputation.
机译:目的:本研究旨在基于企业社会责任的战略和合法性理论,研究战略和制度(规范)企业社会责任(CSR)对品牌价值和品牌声誉的影响。它认为,由于企业社会责任的优势代表着企业为满足利益相关者利益而采取的积极态度,因此作者希望这种积极态度可能会产生商誉积累的累积水平,而这与品牌价值水平正相关。相反,作者希望社会不负责任(对CSR的关注)作为衡量企业对利益相关者利益的反应立场的指标,对这种商誉的增量变化产生不利影响。设计/方法/方法:本文使用CSR优势和来自MSCI ESG(Kinder Lydenburg Domini)的CSR关注得分的规范性(机构)CSR来衡量战略CSR。本文评估了Interbrand列表中的品牌价值水平,并根据Interbrand的100个全球品牌中的品牌价值和品牌排名来衡量品牌声誉。结论:本文找到证据支持作者的理论,即一年,两年和三年的企业社会责任滞后强度对品牌价值水平产生积极影响。这项研究还发现了经验证据,以支持作者关于企业社会责任关注对品牌价值和品牌排名变化产生不利影响的假设。这项研究得出的结论是,企业社会责任优势和企业社会责任关注的不同影响有助于作者更好地理解企业的行动和对利益相关者的利益,品牌价值和排名的反应的影响。实际意义:研究结果表明,战略性CSR可以提升品牌价值,而违反社会规范,价值观和道德规范的不负责任的社会活动则会对公司的合法性产生不利影响,并对品牌声誉的变化产生不利影响。原创性/价值:这项研究提供了新的视角,以区分企业社会责任优势和对品牌价值和品牌声誉的关注的不同影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号