...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Planning & Environment Law >Tort Law and Regulation: Planning and Nuisance
【24h】

Tort Law and Regulation: Planning and Nuisance

机译:侵权法与规章:规划与妨害

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We could say that this is a matter of constitutional appropriateness, and that the relationship between tort and regulation should be left to Parliament. The Planning Act 2008 demonstrates the potential, defining in advance the "strategic decision" that takes priority over private rights, and so removing some of the heat from the relationship between tort and regulation. We might argue that planning is irrelevant to any decision not falling under the Act.
机译:我们可以说,这是宪法上的适当性问题,侵权行为与规章制度之间的关系应留给议会。 《 2008年规划法》展示了这种潜力,它预先定义了优先于私人权利的“战略决策”,因此消除了侵权与规制之间关系的热度。我们可能会争辩说,计划与不属于该法案的任何决定均无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号