...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of organizational behavior >The professionalism of practising law: A comparison across work contexts
【24h】

The professionalism of practising law: A comparison across work contexts

机译:执业法律的专业性:跨工作环境的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Traditionally, the literature assumed that solo practitice best exemplifies the ideal professional work arrangement and that when professionals become salaried employees their professionalism is seriously threatened. The primary goal of this paper is to examine lawyers' sense of professionalism across two work contexts: solo practitioner offices and law firm settings. We also examine status distinctions within law firms, between associates and partners, and compare both to independent practitioners. Solo practitioners and law firm partners are similar on most key dimensions of professionalism, whereas the greatest contrasts occur between partners and associates within law firms. Partners and solo practitioners share similar experiences of autonomy and service as owner-managers, whereas partners and associates share greater collegiality among professionals, perhaps fostered through law firm cultures. All three groups report comparable amounts of variety in their work and are equally committed to the practice of law. The key factors that account for gaps in professionalism reflect the nature of law practices, primarily through time spent with corporate clients and pressure to generate profits. We conclude that different versions of lawyers' professionalism are influenced by the everyday aspects of their work and one version is not necessarily more professional than the other.
机译:传统上,文献认为,单人实践最能代表理想的专业工作安排,而当专业人士成为受薪雇员时,其专业性就会受到严重威胁。本文的主要目标是研究律师在两个工作环境中的专业素养:独立执业律师事务所和律师事务所环境。我们还将研究律师事务所内部,合伙人和合伙人之间的身份区别,并将两者与独立执业者进行比较。独奏从业者和律师事务所的合伙人在专业性的最关键方面相似,而律师事务所的合伙人和合伙人之间的最大反差。合伙人和单独执业者享有与所有者-经理相似的自治权和服务经验,而合伙人和合伙人则在专业人员之间享有更大的共同体,这可能是通过律师事务所的文化来培养的。所有这三个小组在工作中报告了相当数量的多样性,并且同样致力于法律实践。造成专业水平差距的关键因素反映出法律实践的本质,主要是通过与公司客户花费的时间以及产生利润的压力。我们得出结论,律师专业水平的不同版本受其日常工作的影响,一个版本不一定比另一个更为专业。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号