首页> 外文期刊>Journal of organizational behavior management >Square Pegs and Round Holes: Ruminations on the Relationship Between Performance Appraisal and Performance Management
【24h】

Square Pegs and Round Holes: Ruminations on the Relationship Between Performance Appraisal and Performance Management

机译:方钉和圆孔:绩效评估与绩效管理之间关系的反思

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Models of comprehensive Performance Management systems include both employee development and evaluative components. The Organizational Behavior Management discipline focuses almost exclusively on the developmental component, while the Industrial and Organizational Psychology discipline is focused on use of performance appraisals. Performance appraisals have several well-documented shortcomings. Despite those limitations, an examination of Performance Management models suggests that they often include an appraisal component. However, there is little consensus on how Performance Management should incorporate appraisals. The authors argue that performance data should be an output of a Performance Management process, not as an input or starting-point for developmental activities. This emphasizes goal-setting, feedback, and coaching throughout the year, and performance data are aggregated to provide enough information about performance to facilitate administrative decision-making when needed. An optimal performance management system that serves both the developmental and administrative functions can be created by carefully combining the approaches of both disciplines.
机译:全面的绩效管理系统的模型包括员工发展和评估组成部分。组织行为管理学科几乎只专注于发展部分,而工业和组织心理学学科则专注于绩效评估的使用。绩效考核有几个有据可查的缺点。尽管有这些限制,但是对绩效管理模型的检查表明,它们通常包括评估部分。但是,关于绩效管理应如何纳入评估尚无共识。作者认为,绩效数据应该是绩效管理过程的输出,而不是发展活动的输入或起点。这强调了全年的目标设定,反馈和指导,并且汇总了绩效数据以提供有关绩效的足够信息,以在需要时促进行政决策。通过仔细结合两个学科的方法,可以创建一个既能同时发挥开发功能又能发挥行政功能的最佳绩效管理系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号